Making the right start ’em, sit ’em decisions can be the difference between winning and losing your fantasy football matchup each week. Throughout the 2026 NFL season, we’ll break down the best fantasy football starts and sits at quarterback, running back, wide receiver, tight end, defense, and kicker. Using matchups, usage trends, advanced stats, injuries, and scoring opportunities, this weekly Start ’Em, Sit ’Em guide will highlight the players you should trust in your lineup and the ones you may want to leave on the bench.
Want your start/sit questions answered within minutes? Join the Blitz Community for free fantasy football advice all season long.
Quarterbacks to Start
Kirk Cousins, QB (LV)
Kirk Cousins has quietly become one of the more productive fantasy quarterbacks through five weeks, completing 112 of 172 passes for 1,269 yards, 12 touchdowns and four interceptions. He’s averaging 253.8 passing yards and 2.4 touchdowns per game, translating to 19.3 fantasy points per contest and a QB6 ranking. His passing volume has been particularly encouraging, with 34.4 attempts per game, while his 7.4 yards per attempt demonstrates that Las Vegas has been capable of generating meaningful yardage through the air. Cousins delivered three consecutive productive fantasy performances before struggling against New England in Week 5, when he finished with just 13.7 points. His lack of rushing production limits his weekly floor, but the Raiders have consistently given him enough passing opportunities to remain fantasy-relevant.
Buffalo presents one of the most appealing quarterback matchups in football, allowing 22.9 fantasy points per game to the position, the fourth-most in the NFL. The Bills also rank 30th in defensive EPA per play through five weeks and 30th in defensive dropback EPA, making them particularly vulnerable against the pass. That creates an opportunity for Cousins to capitalize on a defense that has struggled to consistently prevent opposing quarterbacks from sustaining drives and generating scoring opportunities. Buffalo has also allowed the most fantasy points to wide receivers at 37.5 per game, creating additional upside for Cousins’ receiving options. I’m expecting Las Vegas to lean heavily on its passing attack, particularly if Buffalo establishes an early lead. Cousins doesn’t offer much rushing upside, but his touchdown production and favorable matchup make him one of my preferred Week 6 streaming quarterbacks.
Jordan Love, QB (GB)
Jordan Love delivered his best performance of the season against Chicago, completing 25 of 31 passes for 367 yards and two touchdowns in Green Bay’s 31-7 victory. He averaged an impressive 11.8 yards per attempt while completing 80.6% of his passes, a significant improvement from his inconsistent accuracy over the opening four weeks. Through five games, Love has completed 112 of 185 attempts for 1,408 yards, 10 touchdowns and three interceptions, averaging 281.6 passing yards and two touchdowns per contest. His 60.5% completion rate remains disappointing, but his efficiency has improved to 7.6 yards per attempt. More importantly, Love has thrown multiple touchdowns in all five games while averaging 37 passing attempts per contest. His limited rushing production makes passing volume particularly important, but Green Bay has consistently provided enough opportunities for him to generate useful fantasy numbers.
Dallas presents arguably the best quarterback matchup of Week 6, allowing 21.5 fantasy points per game to the position, the sixth-most in the NFL. The Cowboys rank last in defensive EPA per play and last in defensive dropback EPA, making them particularly vulnerable against efficient passing attacks. That weakness is encouraging for a quarterback coming off a 367-yard performance, especially with Christian Watson and Matthew Golden providing explosive receiving options. Green Bay’s passing volume also gives Love a relatively dependable floor, and Dallas has struggled to consistently prevent opposing offenses from creating explosive plays and reaching scoring position. I’m expecting another aggressive passing performance from Love, with the opportunity to generate multiple touchdowns against one of the league’s weakest defenses. He’s firmly in my QB1 tier and one of my favorite quarterback starts of Week 6.
Tyler Shough, QB (NO)
Tyler Shough’s promising start took a significant hit against Minnesota, where he completed 16 of 25 passes for just 96 yards without a touchdown while throwing two interceptions. That performance was particularly disappointing after he opened the season with nine passing touchdowns across his first four appearances. Through five games, Shough has completed 137 of 205 passes for 1,299 yards, nine touchdowns and five interceptions, averaging 259.8 passing yards per contest. His 66.8% completion rate is encouraging, although his 6.3 yards per attempt demonstrates that New Orleans hasn’t consistently generated explosive passing plays. Shough has also added 72 rushing yards and a touchdown, providing some additional fantasy value. Despite his Week 5 struggles, he’s averaging 41 passing attempts per game, giving him enough volume to remain an appealing streaming option.
The Giants provide an opportunity for Shough to rebound after facing Minnesota’s top-ranked defense. New York ranks 22nd in defensive EPA per play and 22nd in defensive dropback EPA, making this a considerably more favorable matchup. The Giants have also allowed 19.9 fantasy points per game to quarterbacks, the ninth-most in the NFL, while surrendering 25.4 points per game to wide receivers. That combination suggests New Orleans should have opportunities to generate more consistent passing production than it managed against Minnesota. Shough’s five interceptions and three lost fumbles are legitimate concerns, and I’m not expecting him to suddenly become an elite quarterback. However, his substantial passing volume and favorable matchup create a realistic path toward 250-plus yards and multiple touchdowns. I’m treating him as a lower-end QB1 or strong streaming option in Week 6.
Quarterbacks to Sit
Patrick Mahomes, QB (KC)
Patrick Mahomes has remained productive through four appearances, completing 82 of 128 passes for 1,037 yards, nine touchdowns and two interceptions. He’s averaging 259.3 passing yards, 2.3 touchdowns and approximately 21.4 fantasy points per game, while his 8.1 yards per attempt demonstrates that Kansas City’s passing offense has been relatively efficient. Mahomes has also contributed 41 rushing yards and a touchdown, providing additional fantasy upside despite not relying heavily on designed rushing opportunities. However, his season-long fantasy production has been heavily influenced by touchdown efficiency, and his limited rushing volume leaves him more dependent on passing scores than many of the other high-end fantasy quarterbacks.
The Chargers have been one of the NFL’s most effective defenses through five weeks, ranking sixth in defensive EPA per play and allowing just 15.8 fantasy points per game to quarterbacks, the 12th-fewest in the league. Los Angeles also ranks sixth in defensive dropback EPA and has held opposing offenses to a 42% success rate, reinforcing its ability to limit efficient offensive production. That creates a challenging matchup for Mahomes, particularly because Kansas City’s passing touchdowns have accounted for such a substantial portion of his fantasy scoring. I’m not expecting the Chargers to completely shut down Mahomes, and his ability to produce multiple touchdowns makes him difficult to bench outright. However, I’m treating this as a relative downgrade with the injuries in the wide receiver room for KC. If I have another legitimate QB1 with a favorable matchup, such as Jordan Love, I’m willing to make that switch this week.
Bryce Young, QB (CAR)
Bryce Young has produced some impressive fantasy performances this season, completing 101 of 162 passes for 1,268 yards, nine touchdowns and two interceptions through four appearances. He’s averaging 317 passing yards and 22.6 fantasy points per game, with a strong 7.8 yards per attempt despite completing just 62.3% of his passes. Young has also added a rushing touchdown, although his 19 rushing yards demonstrate that his fantasy production remains overwhelmingly dependent on passing efficiency and touchdowns. His early-season numbers have been encouraging, particularly after opening the year with consecutive strong fantasy performances. However, his lack of meaningful rushing production makes him more vulnerable to touchdown regression, especially if Carolina struggles to sustain the scoring efficiency that has supported his fantasy production.
Philadelphia presents an interesting matchup because its defensive results haven’t been particularly impressive through five weeks. The Eagles rank 24th in defensive EPA per play and 24th in defensive dropback EPA, while allowing 19.3 fantasy points per game to quarterbacks. Those numbers suggest Young could have opportunities to generate passing production, particularly if Carolina falls behind and needs to become more aggressive. However that same defense is only allowing 22.4 PPG. Philadelphia’s defensive personnel still has the ability to create pressure and disrupt drives, and will be Young’s toughest matchup of the season. He’s a high-upside QB2 rather than a quarterback I’m comfortable automatically starting in traditional one-quarterback leagues.
Aaron Rodgers, QB (PIT)
Aaron Rodgers has quietly delivered three consecutive strong fantasy performances, throwing nine touchdowns and averaging 275.3 passing yards per game during that stretch. He completed 22 of 31 passes for 235 yards and three touchdowns against Indianapolis in Week 5, with Pat Freiermuth catching five passes for 44 yards and two scores and rookie Germie Bernard adding six receptions for 80 yards. However, Pittsburgh’s receiving corps is becoming dangerously thin. Michael Pittman Jr. is on injured reserve, while Roman Wilson and Ben Skowronek have already been ruled out against Tampa Bay. That leaves DK Metcalf, Freiermuth and Bernard carrying much of the receiving workload. Rodgers has also rushed for just 18 yards through five games, leaving him heavily dependent on passing touchdowns to deliver strong fantasy performances.
Tampa Bay is a challenging matchup, ranking fifth in defensive EPA per play (-0.056), although injuries in its secondary could make the Buccaneers easier to attack than those season-long numbers suggest. Antoine Winfield Jr. and Ayden Garnes missed Wednesday’s practice, while Benjamin Morrison was limited, making their availability worth monitoring. Those potential absences give Rodgers an opportunity to maintain his recent success, especially if Pittsburgh continues leaning on shorter throws to Freiermuth and Bernard. However, the Steelers’ depleted receiving depth creates concerns about sustaining that efficiency, and Rodgers doesn’t have the rushing production to offset a game without multiple passing touchdowns. Despite his recent hot streak, I’m treating him as a lower-end QB2 rather than a preferred Week 6 starter.
Running Backs to Start
Cam Skattebo, RB (NYG)
Cam Skattebo hasn’t delivered the breakout season I expected, but his workload remains encouraging. Through five games, he’s rushed for 294 yards and one touchdown on 81 carries while adding 10 receptions for 79 yards. He’s averaging just 3.6 yards per carry and has scored only once, making his lack of explosive plays particularly frustrating. Against Washington in Week 5, Skattebo rushed 13 times for 59 yards and caught two passes for 12 yards, but a lost fumble hurt his fantasy production. Skattebo has fumbled four times through five games, although his costly overtime turnover against Washington was the first he actually lost. Ball security is becoming a concern, but the Giants haven’t significantly reduced his workload, as he’s handled at least 15 touches in every appearance.
New Orleans gives Skattebo an excellent opportunity to turn that volume into meaningful fantasy production. The Saints rank 27th in defensive EPA per play and have allowed 133.4 rushing yards per game to running backs, along with a 48.9% rushing success rate. Opposing backs are averaging 3.8 yards after contact per carry, the third-most in the NFL, while seven running backs have already scored double-digit fantasy points against this defense. That matters for Skattebo because he’s struggled to consistently create additional yardage on his own, averaging just 2.0 yards after contact per attempt. The matchup should provide more opportunities to get into the second level, and his involvement in the passing game gives him another way to contribute. I’m expecting Skattebo to deliver one of his better performances of the season, making him a strong RB2 with legitimate RB1 upside.
Dameon Pierce, RB (PHI)
Dameon Pierce suddenly finds himself in position to lead Philadelphia’s backfield after a brutal stretch of injuries. Saquon Barkley has missed time with a hamstring injury, Tank Bigsby is on injured reserve following core muscle surgery, and Will Shipley suffered a partial plantar fascia tear against Jacksonville that is expected to sideline him for multiple games. Pierce stepped into the lead role after Shipley exited in Week 5, finishing with 11 carries for just 14 yards while catching two of five targets for negative two receiving yards. That production was obviously disappointing, but Philadelphia’s offensive line has also been dealing with significant injuries. The situation has become even more concerning with Jalen Hurts ruled out for Week 6 after a superficial blood clot was discovered in his calf. Tanner McKee is expected to start against Carolina, creating additional uncertainty about Philadelphia’s offensive efficiency. Pierce hasn’t been a regular featured back in several seasons, but the opportunity to handle a substantial workload makes him difficult to ignore.
Carolina presents an appealing matchup for whoever leads Philadelphia’s backfield, allowing 25.6 fantasy points per game to running backs, the fifth-most in the NFL. The Panthers rank 21st in defensive EPA per play and have struggled to consistently limit opposing rushing attacks. With McKee replacing Hurts, Philadelphia could lean more heavily on its running game to take pressure off its backup quarterback, potentially creating additional carries for Pierce. Barkley’s availability remains the deciding factor after he missed Wednesday’s practice. If Barkley is ruled out, I’m comfortable starting Pierce as a volume-dependent RB2 or flex option, although Carson Steele could also see opportunities. If Barkley returns without restrictions, Pierce belongs back on the bench.
Rhamondre Stevenson, RB (NE)
Rhamondre Stevenson has quietly put together consecutive strong fantasy performances, and his role could become even more valuable with TreVeyon Henderson dealing with an ankle injury. Stevenson rushed 13 times for 64 yards and a touchdown against Las Vegas in Week 5 while adding three receptions for 21 yards, giving him another performance with at least 17 PPR points. Through five games, he’s averaging 11.4 carries, 45.4 rushing yards, 3.8 receptions and 22.2 receiving yards per contest. That receiving involvement has been particularly important because New England hasn’t consistently generated explosive rushing plays. However, Henderson isn’t the only other running back who could affect Stevenson’s workload. Corey Kiner impressed against Las Vegas, rushing six times for 52 yards while adding a seven-yard reception. Henderson’s absence wouldn’t necessarily leave Stevenson with the entire backfield, although his established passing-down and scoring-area roles still make him the preferred fantasy option.
The Jets are another favorable opponent for Stevenson, allowing 21.7 PPR fantasy points per game to running backs. New York ranks 10th in defensive EPA per play, but that overall ranking hides some significant problems against the run. The Jets rank 29th in defensive rushing EPA and have allowed significant production to opposing fantasy running backs this season. That weakness is particularly appealing for Stevenson because New England should be able to establish a more balanced offensive approach rather than relying exclusively on Drake Maye. Henderson’s ankle injury could also create additional opportunities for Stevenson, particularly in passing situations and near the goal line, even if Kiner continues receiving carries. I’m viewing Stevenson as a strong RB2 with top-12 upside if Henderson remains sidelined.
Tony Pollard, RB (TEN)
Tony Pollard hasn’t been particularly exciting for fantasy football, but his workload has remained relatively dependable despite Tennessee’s offensive struggles. Through five games, he’s averaging 13.6 carries for 54.6 rushing yards while adding 2.4 targets and 1.6 receptions per contest. His 4.0 yards per carry isn’t particularly concerning, but he’s scored only one rushing touchdown and hasn’t consistently contributed enough as a receiver to offset Tennessee’s limited scoring opportunities. Pollard handled 14 of the Titans’ 17 running back carries against Houston in Week 5, demonstrating that he remains the clear leader of the backfield. Unfortunately, Tennessee managed just three points in that loss and is averaging a league-low 11.6 points per game. That’s a significant problem for a running back who relies heavily on rushing volume and touchdown opportunities, especially with the Titans’ offensive line struggling to consistently protect the quarterback and sustain drives.
Indianapolis presents one of Pollard’s better matchups of the season, allowing 24.6 PPR fantasy points per game to running backs, the sixth-most in the NFL. The Colts rank 26th in defensive EPA per play and 31st in defensive rushing EPA, making them one of the league’s least efficient defenses against the run. They also allowed Jaylen Warren to generate 188 scrimmage yards and two touchdowns in Week 5, demonstrating how vulnerable this defense can be when opposing backs receive consistent opportunities. However, Tennessee’s offensive limitations make Pollard far from a guaranteed start. If the Titans fall behind early, his rushing volume could disappear, and this offense hasn’t demonstrated that it can consistently create scoring opportunities even against weaker opponents. I’m willing to trust Pollard as a lower-end RB2 or flex because of the matchup and his established role, but his limited receiving involvement and Tennessee’s struggling offense significantly cap his ceiling.
Running Backs to Sit
Woody Marks, RB (HOU)
Woody Marks is one of the more interesting running backs entering Week 6 because his workload could increase dramatically following David Montgomery’s groin injury. Montgomery exited Houston’s Week 5 victory over Tennessee and didn’t return, allowing Marks to take over the backfield. He finished with 15 carries for 62 yards while catching four passes for 23 yards, giving him 85 scrimmage yards in his most productive performance of the season. More importantly, Marks played 95.7% of the offensive snaps over the final three quarters after Montgomery exited, handling all 13 running back carries during that stretch. He also posted a 66.7% route participation rate and an 11.5% target share during those three quarters. Those usage numbers are encouraging, and Montgomery’s absence from Wednesday’s practice suggests Marks could be positioned for another substantial workload. With Montgomery considered week-to-week, Marks is one of my favorite waiver-wire pickups because of his potential value beyond Week 6.
However, Jacksonville is about as difficult a matchup as Marks could draw for his first opportunity to lead Houston’s backfield, particularly with the game being played in London. The Jaguars rank fourth in defensive EPA per play and fourth in defensive rushing EPA, while allowing the second-fewest fantasy points per game to running backs. They’ve also surrendered the second-lowest explosive run rate, fifth-lowest rushing success rate, and fewest yards after contact per attempt to opposing backs. That creates a difficult environment for a Houston offense that has struggled to consistently establish its running game, even when Montgomery has been healthy. Marks’ potential receiving involvement provides some PPR upside, and I’m interested in his rest-of-season value if he maintains a featured role. However, there’s a difference between being a valuable waiver-wire addition and being someone I’m comfortable starting immediately against one of the league’s strongest defensive fronts. He’s a volume-dependent flex option rather than a preferred Week 6 starter.
Omarion Hampton, RB (LAC)
Omarion Hampton’s usage has become one of the most frustrating developments in fantasy football, particularly after entering the season with expectations of becoming a featured running back. Through five games, he’s averaging 14.6 carries for 54.2 rushing yards while contributing very little as a receiver, with just five catches for 35 yards on the season. His role became even more concerning against Denver in Week 5, when he played only 31.7% of the Chargers’ offensive snaps while handling 41.2% of the team’s rushing attempts. Hampton averaged just 2.4 yards per carry in that game and ran only two routes, demonstrating how limited his involvement has become outside of early-down rushing situations. Kimani Vidal and Keaton Mitchell have taken on larger roles, particularly in passing situations, leaving Hampton without the dependable three-down workload fantasy managers expected.
Kansas City makes that declining workload even more concerning, ranking eighth in defensive EPA per play and eighth in defensive rushing EPA. The Chiefs have allowed the eighth-lowest rushing success rate, fewest yards before contact per attempt, and third-lowest missed tackle rate to opposing running backs. That’s a difficult combination for Hampton, particularly when the Chargers haven’t consistently given him opportunities to contribute as a receiver. Los Angeles has also struggled offensively, creating the possibility that another negative game script could push more snaps toward Vidal and Mitchell. Hampton still has the talent to generate explosive plays, but I’m not willing to rely on that upside when his snap share and receiving involvement have become so limited. He’s a touchdown-dependent flex option rather than a dependable RB2, and I’m keeping him on the bench in traditional leagues.
Jeremiyah Love, RB (ARI)
Jeremiyah Love has been one of the biggest disappointments in fantasy football through five weeks, particularly after entering the season with enormous expectations as the third overall pick. He’s rushed for 245 yards and one touchdown on 67 carries, averaging just 3.7 yards per attempt while adding 11 receptions for 36 yards. His Week 5 performance against Detroit was especially concerning, as he managed only 22 yards on 12 carries and finished with a season-low 2.2 fantasy points. Love has now scored fewer than eight fantasy points in three of his last four games, and his rushing efficiency hasn’t shown meaningful improvement. More importantly, he’s dealing with an ankle injury that appears to be affecting his workload. Over the last two games, Love has averaged just 13.5 touches and 38.5 scrimmage yards while playing 47% of Arizona’s offensive snaps. Tyler Allgeier has remained involved, preventing Love from establishing the featured role fantasy managers expected.
The Rams present an interesting matchup because their overall defensive performance has been considerably better than their rushing efficiency. Los Angeles ranks 11th in defensive EPA per play, but 24th in defensive rushing EPA, suggesting there are opportunities for opposing backs to generate production on the ground. The Rams have allowed the highest rushing success rate, ninth-highest explosive run rate, and eighth-most yards before contact per attempt to running backs, so this isn’t an impossible matchup for Love. However, his declining workload and ankle injury make it difficult to trust him even in a potentially favorable situation. Love has not practiced to open the week, and his receiving involvement has also fallen significantly, with just a 19.4% route share and 2.4% target share over the last two games. If Love cannot play, Allgeier could move into the starting role. Even if Love is active, I’m not comfortable relying on a running back who isn’t consistently healthy, efficient or heavily involved in his offense. Until his ankle improves and Arizona commits to giving him a larger role, he’s a risky flex option rather than a player I’m comfortable starting.
Wide Receivers to Start
Denzel Boston, WR (CLE)
Denzel Boston has quietly become one of Cleveland’s most dependable receiving options through five weeks, catching 16 of 29 targets for 330 yards. He’s averaging 66 receiving yards per game despite seeing fewer than six targets per contest, which speaks to his ability to make the most of his opportunities. Boston has also been a consistent downfield option, earning nine deep targets while averaging 2.10 yards per route run. His 18.2% target share leaves room for additional opportunities, particularly if Cleveland starts involving him more consistently in the intermediate passing game. The biggest concern entering Week 6 is his foot injury, which has limited his practice participation. Cleveland’s offensive line is also dealing with injuries, including Tytus Howard’s absence from Wednesday’s practice. That’s worth monitoring because Boston’s production depends partly on Cleveland having enough time to develop downfield routes.
Baltimore is an appealing opponent for Boston because the Ravens have struggled to prevent opposing receivers from making plays downfield. They’ve allowed the tenth-most yards per target to perimeter receivers, and their defense ranks 18th in EPA per play through five weeks. The Ravens also frequently play with two deep safeties, which could create opportunities for Boston to work into the intermediate areas of the field rather than relying exclusively on contested catches along the sideline. Cleveland’s offensive-line situation could force its quarterback to get rid of the ball quickly, but Boston has demonstrated that he doesn’t need a massive target total to produce. I’m expecting him to remain a significant part of Cleveland’s passing attack, particularly if the Browns are forced to throw more frequently. Assuming his foot injury doesn’t limit his playing time, Boston is a strong WR3 with legitimate WR2 upside against Baltimore.
Luther Burden III, WR (CHI)
Luther Burden has become one of Chicago’s more reliable receiving options, catching 23 passes for 266 yards through five games. He’s averaging seven targets and 53.2 receiving yards per contest while earning a 20.3% target share and 25.2% of the team’s first-read opportunities. Burden has also been targeted eight times in the red zone, an encouraging sign that Chicago wants to involve him near the goal line. However, the Bears’ passing offense has been difficult to trust with Caleb Williams sidelined by a hamstring injury. Tyson Bagent struggled badly against Green Bay in Week 5, throwing for just 87 yards and two interceptions. Williams’ potential return is therefore one of the biggest developments for Burden’s fantasy outlook. He was listed as a full participant in Wednesday’s estimated practice report, although his status as Sunday’s starter hasn’t been officially confirmed.
Atlanta isn’t an easy matchup for slot receivers, but I like Burden’s opportunity if Williams returns and gives Chicago a better chance to sustain drives. The Falcons rank seventh in defensive EPA per play and have been particularly effective defending receivers working inside, allowing the second-fewest fantasy points per opportunity to slot receivers. However, Atlanta frequently uses single-high safety coverage, and Burden has consistently earned opportunities against those looks. His ability to separate underneath and create yards after the catch gives Chicago a way to involve him without relying on difficult downfield throws. Williams’ return could change how targets are distributed among Burden, Rome Odunze, and Colston Loveland, but I believe the improvement in quarterback play would outweigh that uncertainty. I’m comfortable starting Burden as a WR3 with WR2 upside if Williams returns, although I’d lower expectations if Bagent remains the starter.
Wan’Dale Robinson, WR (TEN)
Wan’Dale Robinson hasn’t delivered much explosive production this season, but his role in Tennessee’s passing offense gives him some value in PPR leagues. Through five games, he’s caught 22 passes for 176 yards and two touchdowns while averaging six targets per contest. His 8.0 yards per reception highlights how frequently the Titans use him on shorter throws, which limits his yardage ceiling but creates opportunities to accumulate receptions. Robinson owns a 19.4% target share, although his 1.32 yards per route run demonstrates that those opportunities haven’t consistently translated into meaningful production. Tennessee’s quarterback situation is the biggest obstacle. Cam Ward has thrown just three touchdowns through five games, and the Titans are averaging a league-low 11.6 points per contest. Robinson has been heating up more as of late with three straight performances over 10 points.
Indianapolis provides a better opportunity for Robinson because the Colts have been more vulnerable to receivers working underneath than those lining up on the perimeter. Indianapolis ranks 26th in defensive EPA per play and has allowed 26.6 fantasy points per game to wide receivers, although its coverage has been considerably more effective against outside receivers. That’s important because Robinson doesn’t need to win consistently downfield to contribute. His best path to fantasy production is through short completions that help Ward move the chains, particularly if Tennessee falls behind and has to throw more frequently. I’m not expecting Robinson to suddenly become a major big-play threat, and his touchdown upside remains limited in this offense. However, the matchup gives him a realistic opportunity to catch five or six passes and deliver a useful fantasy performance. He’s a viable PPR flex option, especially for managers dealing with injuries or bye weeks.
Wide Receivers to Sit
Xavier Worthy, WR (KC)
Xavier Worthy has been one of the more disappointing receivers in Kansas City’s offense, catching just 14 of 22 targets for 133 yards and one touchdown through four games. He’s averaging 5.5 targets and 33.3 receiving yards per contest despite playing with Patrick Mahomes, and his 9.7-yard average depth of target shows that he hasn’t been used exclusively as a deep threat. The problem is that his opportunities haven’t consistently resulted in meaningful fantasy production. However, Kansas City’s receiving corps is dealing with injuries that could significantly change Worthy’s role. Tyquan Thornton suffered a dislocated ankle and is expected to miss an extended period, while Rashee Rice missed Wednesday’s practice with a hamstring injury. If Rice is also unavailable, Worthy should have a more secure route to playing time and could see additional targets simply because Kansas City has fewer established receiving options.
Even with those injuries, I’m concerned about trusting Worthy against the Chargers. Los Angeles ranks sixth in defensive EPA per play and ninth in defensive dropback EPA in the RBSDM dataset, while allowing just 26.3 fantasy points per game to wide receivers. That’s a difficult matchup for a player who has yet to establish a dependable weekly target floor. Worthy’s speed gives him the ability to turn one reception into a touchdown, and I would absolutely raise his projection if Rice is ruled out. However, additional routes don’t guarantee that Mahomes will consistently look his way, especially if Kansas City leans on Travis Kelce and shorter passing concepts to attack the Chargers. Worthy’s ceiling is appealing, but his floor remains extremely low for a player averaging barely 33 receiving yards per game. I’m treating him as a boom-or-bust flex rather than a receiver I’m comfortable starting over more established options.
Emeka Egbuka, WR (TB)
Emeka Egbuka’s disappointing production has been frustrating because Tampa Bay continues giving him opportunities in the passing game. Through five weeks, he’s caught 21 of 33 targets for 192 yards and one receiving touchdown, averaging just 38.4 receiving yards per contest. His 85.6% snap share demonstrates that playing time isn’t the problem, but his 1.25 yards per route run reflects how little production the Buccaneers have generated when targeting him. The quarterback situation has played a significant role. Baker Mayfield has missed two consecutive games with a dislocated thumb on his throwing hand, leaving rookie Jalon Daniels to lead the offense. Egbuka has earned 13 targets during Daniels’ two starts, including a 36% target share against Dallas, but those opportunities haven’t consistently translated into meaningful receiving yardage. Daniels has struggled to push the ball downfield, forcing Tampa Bay to rely heavily on shorter throws and limiting Egbuka’s opportunities to generate explosive plays.
Pittsburgh isn’t an appealing opponent for a receiver already struggling to turn targets into production. The Steelers have allowed just 21.9 fantasy points per game to wide receivers, the sixth-fewest in the NFL, and their defensive front creates additional problems for an offense relying on an inexperienced quarterback. Mayfield has not resumed throwing and is out for Week 6, meaning Daniels will make his third consecutive start against Pittsburgh. That’s concerning for Egbuka because his increased involvement hasn’t resulted in efficient receiving production, and the Steelers’ pass rush could force Daniels into another conservative passing approach. Egbuka’s playing time and target share are encouraging for his long-term outlook, but I’m not comfortable relying on those opportunities when Tampa Bay is struggling to consistently move the football. Until the Buccaneers can generate more efficient passing production, I’m keeping Egbuka on the bench as a low-upside flex option.
Michael Wilson, WR (ARI)
Michael Wilson is one of Arizona’s most important offensive players, and his role should become even more secure following the trade that sent Marvin Harrison Jr. to Houston. Through five games, Wilson is averaging 10.2 targets, 5.8 receptions and 57.6 receiving yards while earning a 24% target share and nearly 30% of the team’s first-read opportunities. He’s also received eight red-zone targets and seven deep targets, demonstrating that Arizona wants him involved in high-value situations. Harrison’s departure removes another established receiver from the offense, potentially creating even more opportunities for Wilson alongside Trey McBride. However, his 1.47 yards per route run demonstrates that his production has been driven more by volume than efficiency. Jacoby Brissett’s preference for shorter throws has also made it difficult for Arizona to consistently generate explosive passing plays, which could become an even bigger problem against a talented Rams secondary.
Los Angeles presents one of Wilson’s most difficult individual matchups of the season, particularly if Trent McDuffie spends significant time covering him. McDuffie has been outstanding in coverage, earning an 88.7 PFF coverage grade while allowing just five receptions and a 21.1 passer rating when targeted. The Rams have also allowed the sixth-fewest yards per target and third-fewest fantasy points per game to perimeter receivers, making this a difficult matchup for a player who earns most of his opportunities outside. I’m concerned that Brissett will struggle to consistently connect with Wilson downfield, particularly if McDuffie prevents him from creating separation on intermediate routes. However, Harrison’s departure makes Wilson’s workload too valuable to ignore, and I’m not suggesting fantasy managers automatically bench a receiver who could see double-digit targets. He’s still a player most teams should start, but I believe this is a legitimate spot for a disappointing performance relative to expectations. Wilson is one of my biggest potential bust candidates in Week 6.
Carnell Tate, WR (TEN)
Carnell Tate has earned a substantial role in Tennessee’s passing offense, but his fantasy production hasn’t reflected how frequently Cam Ward looks his way. Through five games, Tate has caught 23 of 37 targets for 274 yards while averaging 54.8 receiving yards per contest. His 23.9% target share and 32.3% first-read share demonstrate that Tennessee wants him involved, particularly when the offense needs to generate yardage downfield. Tate has also averaged 1.94 yards per route run, which is encouraging considering how inconsistent the Titans have been offensively. The biggest issue has been the quality of his opportunities rather than his ability to earn targets. Only 75.7% of his targets have been considered catchable, and he’s received just one red-zone target through five games. That’s a difficult combination for a receiver who primarily operates on the perimeter and relies on accurate throws to generate meaningful yardage.
Indianapolis makes Tate’s situation even more concerning because the Colts have been considerably more effective against perimeter receivers than their overall defensive numbers suggest. Indianapolis ranks 26th in defensive EPA per play, but its secondary has allowed the fourth-fewest yards per target and third-fewest fantasy points per opportunity to receivers lined up outside. Tate has run nearly three-quarters of his routes from the perimeter, making this a difficult individual matchup even though the Colts have allowed significant production to wide receivers overall. Tennessee’s offensive struggles also make it difficult to project enough high-quality targets for Tate to overcome that coverage. Ward has thrown just three touchdowns through five games, and the Titans haven’t consistently sustained drives long enough to create meaningful scoring opportunities. Wan’Dale Robinson has a more appealing matchup working underneath, while Tate will likely need several difficult completions downfield to deliver a strong fantasy performance. I’m keeping Tate on the bench as a risky, volume-dependent flex option this week.
Tight Ends to Start
Dallas Goedert, TE (PHI)
Dallas Goedert returned from his knee injury in Week 5 and immediately became one of Philadelphia’s most important receiving options. Against Jacksonville, he caught six of nine targets for 38 yards, leading the Eagles in both receptions and targets. Through three appearances, Goedert has caught 11 passes for 119 yards and two touchdowns on 16 targets, averaging 11.6 PPR fantasy points per game. His role could become even more important with Philadelphia dealing with significant injuries to Saquon Barkley and DeVonta Smith. However, the biggest development is Jalen Hurts being ruled out for Week 6 after a superficial blood clot was discovered in his calf. Tanner McKee is expected to start against Carolina, creating uncertainty about the Eagles’ overall offensive efficiency but potentially increasing their reliance on short, high-percentage passes to Goedert.
Carolina provides a favorable matchup, having allowed three tight ends to score at least 11 fantasy points this season, including two performances exceeding 22 points. That’s encouraging for Goedert, particularly if Smith remains unavailable and McKee relies on his tight end as a dependable underneath target. Philadelphia could emphasize shorter throws and quick completions to help its backup quarterback, giving Goedert an opportunity to maintain the substantial target share he received against Jacksonville. However, Hurts’ absence also lowers the offense’s overall scoring ceiling and could limit Goedert’s touchdown opportunities. His nine-target performance in Week 5 makes me optimistic about his involvement, but the quarterback change introduces more uncertainty than his favorable matchup might suggest. I’m still starting Goedert as a TE1 against Carolina, although I’d lower his ceiling slightly with McKee replacing Hurts.
Pat Freiermuth, TE (PIT)
Pat Freiermuth has quietly become one of Aaron Rodgers’ most dependable scoring options, and his involvement in Pittsburgh’s passing offense has been encouraging. Through five games, he’s caught 19 of 26 targets for 169 yards and four touchdowns, averaging 3.8 receptions and 33.8 receiving yards per contest. He caught five of seven targets for 44 yards and two touchdowns against Indianapolis in Week 5, giving him four receiving touchdowns through five games. More importantly, Freiermuth ran 27 routes on Rodgers’ 38 dropbacks, giving him approximately 71% route participation. That’s an encouraging sign for a player whose fantasy production has been heavily dependent on touchdowns. Pittsburgh is also dealing with injuries at wide receiver, with Roman Wilson and Ben Skowronek unavailable and Michael Pittman Jr. on injured reserve. However, rookie Germie Bernard has emerged as another receiving option after catching six passes for 80 yards against Indianapolis, so Freiermuth isn’t guaranteed to inherit every available target.
Tampa Bay presents an appealing matchup for Freiermuth because the Buccaneers have struggled to consistently defend opposing tight ends. They’ve allowed the fifth-highest EPA against the position, creating opportunities for offenses to attack the middle of the field. That aligns well with Freiermuth’s role in Pittsburgh, particularly because Rodgers has consistently looked his way near the goal line. The Steelers could also rely more heavily on their tight ends with several receivers unavailable, although Bernard’s emergence gives Rodgers another option outside of DK Metcalf. I’m not expecting Freiermuth to continue scoring touchdowns at his current pace, especially when he’s averaging fewer than 35 receiving yards per game. However, his increased route participation gives him a better opportunity to maintain useful fantasy production even when he doesn’t score. I’m comfortable starting Freiermuth as a lower-end TE1 with significant touchdown upside against Tampa Bay.
Tyler Higbee, TE (LAR)
Tyler Higbee has quietly become one of the more dependable tight ends in fantasy football over the last three weeks, and injuries in Los Angeles’ tight end room have played a significant role in his resurgence. Through five games, he’s caught 20 passes for 224 yards and one touchdown, but the season-long numbers don’t fully capture his recent production. Higbee caught eight passes for 62 yards and a touchdown in Week 3 before adding five receptions for 67 yards against Philadelphia and five catches for 83 yards against Buffalo. That’s 18 receptions for 212 yards and a touchdown over his last three games. His increased involvement coincided with an injury to Terrance Ferguson that landed him on injured reserve, while Colby Parkinson also missed time before returning in Week 5. Those absences created additional opportunities for Higbee, and he’s taken advantage of them. However, the Rams continue using multiple-tight-end formations, with Parkinson and Davis Allen also involved, so his workload isn’t necessarily guaranteed to remain this productive every week.
Arizona presents an appealing opportunity for Higbee to continue his recent success, as the Cardinals have allowed the fifth-most fantasy points per game to opposing tight ends. Los Angeles has one of the league’s most productive passing offenses, and Matthew Stafford has been willing to spread the football around when defenses focus on Puka Nacua and Davante Adams. Higbee has particularly benefited from his involvement in three-receiver formations, which allows him to work underneath while opposing defenses concentrate on preventing explosive plays outside. Parkinson’s return creates some uncertainty about Higbee’s weekly route participation, but his five-catch, 83-yard performance against Buffalo demonstrated that he can remain productive even when the Rams rotate their tight ends. I’m encouraged by three consecutive games with at least 62 receiving yards, and I believe his current role gives him a realistic opportunity to continue that streak. Higbee is a TE1 for Week 6, particularly in PPR formats, although his target floor could fluctuate depending on Los Angeles’ personnel packages.
Tight Ends to Sit
Dalton Kincaid, TE (BUF)
Dalton Kincaid has become one of the most frustrating tight ends in fantasy football because his playing time hasn’t translated into consistent receiving opportunities. Through five games, he’s caught 16 passes for 277 yards and one touchdown on 21 targets, averaging 55.4 receiving yards per contest. Those season-long numbers are heavily influenced by his early performances, as his involvement has declined significantly over the last three weeks. Kincaid caught two passes for 38 yards against the Chargers in Week 3 before recording just one reception for seven yards against New England in Week 4. He followed that with another one-catch, seven-yard performance against the Rams in Week 5, giving him only four receptions for 52 yards over his last three games. Buffalo has also continued using Dawson Knox and Jackson Hawes in multiple-tight-end formations. Through five weeks, Knox has played 222 offensive snaps compared to Kincaid’s 215, demonstrating that Kincaid hasn’t separated himself as Buffalo’s clear lead tight end.
Las Vegas is an appealing matchup on paper, but I’m not willing to overlook how little Kincaid has contributed recently. The Raiders have allowed four tight ends to score at least 10 fantasy points this season, and their defense has struggled to consistently limit production through the middle of the field. However, a favorable matchup doesn’t guarantee Kincaid will suddenly become a featured part of Buffalo’s passing attack. Kincaid’s recent target totals suggest Buffalo isn’t consistently designing enough opportunities for him to deliver dependable fantasy production, regardless of the opponent. He certainly has the talent to take advantage of this matchup, but I’m not comfortable starting someone who has caught just two passes for 14 yards over his last two games. Until his target volume improves, I’m treating Kincaid as a risky streaming option rather than a dependable TE1.
Colston Loveland, TE (CHI)
Colston Loveland has been one of the most disappointing tight ends in fantasy football, particularly after entering the season with expectations of becoming a major part of Chicago’s passing offense. Through five games, he’s caught just 13 of 23 targets for 110 yards without a touchdown, averaging only 22 receiving yards per contest. His playing time hasn’t been the issue, as he’s participated in more than 85% of Chicago’s offensive snaps, but those opportunities haven’t consistently translated into targets. Loveland appeared to be turning things around against the Jets in Week 4, catching six of nine targets for 57 yards while playing more than 90% of the offensive snaps. Unfortunately, that progress disappeared against Green Bay in Week 5, when he caught just two of five targets for 19 yards. Caleb Williams could return from his hamstring injury this week, but that doesn’t automatically guarantee Loveland will receive a larger role.
The Falcons have been effective defending opposing passing attacks, ranking seventh in defensive EPA per play, and frequently use single-high safety coverage. Loveland has struggled against those looks, averaging just 0.67 yards per route run while earning targets on only 14% of his routes against single-high coverage. That’s concerning for a tight end who hasn’t consistently demonstrated the ability to generate production without a substantial target total. Williams’ potential return could improve Chicago’s overall offensive efficiency, but it could also shift more opportunities toward the team’s established wide receivers. Loveland’s talent remains appealing, and his playing time suggests the Bears still want him involved. However, I’m not willing to rely on a player averaging just 2.6 receptions per game without a touchdown this season. He’s a touchdown-dependent streaming option rather than someone I’m comfortable starting in Week 6.
Kyle Pitts, TE (ATL)
Kyle Pitts finally delivered a productive fantasy performance in Week 5, but I’m not convinced that one strong game means his role has fundamentally changed. Through five games, he’s caught 10 passes for 109 yards and one touchdown on 15 targets, averaging just three targets and 21.8 receiving yards per contest. His Week 5 performance against Baltimore was encouraging, as he caught five of six targets for 42 yards and his first touchdown of the season. Those five receptions matched his combined total from the previous four games, highlighting just how limited his involvement had been entering the matchup. Pitts has also dealt with inconsistent route participation, making it difficult to trust his weekly opportunities. One encouraging development is that Michael Penix Jr. practiced fully Wednesday after suffering a rib injury against Baltimore. Penix took first-team repetitions and is expected to start against Chicago, assuming he avoids any setbacks.
Chicago makes Pitts a difficult player to trust despite his encouraging Week 5 performance. The Bears have allowed the third-fewest fantasy points per game to tight ends, with Tucker Kraft being the only player at the position to exceed six fantasy points against them this season. That’s a concerning matchup for someone who has averaged just two receptions per game and hasn’t consistently been a featured part of Atlanta’s passing offense. Penix’s expected return provides stability, but it doesn’t automatically mean Pitts will maintain the six targets he received against Baltimore. I understand the temptation to start him after finally seeing a productive performance, but I’m not willing to chase one strong outing following four disappointing weeks. Until Atlanta consistently gives Pitts a larger receiving role, I’m keeping him on the bench in favor of tight ends with more dependable workloads.
Defenses to Start
New England Patriots DEF
New England has become an appealing defensive streaming option, particularly because of its ability to limit opposing offenses and create difficult passing situations. The Patriots rank 16th in defensive EPA per play (-0.012), allowing negative EPA against both the pass and run. Their defense also enters Week 6 with momentum following a 45-17 victory over Las Vegas, a game in which New England controlled the scoreboard and forced the Raiders into unfavorable passing situations. Christian Gonzalez’s availability is another important factor to monitor, as his presence would strengthen a secondary capable of challenging opposing receivers.
The Jets present an interesting matchup because Geno Smith has protected the football relatively well, throwing six touchdowns without an interception through five weeks. However, New York has struggled to consistently finish drives, and Smith remains vulnerable when opposing defenses generate pressure. The Jets have allowed 5.6 fantasy points per game to opposing defenses, so this isn’t an automatic smash matchup. Still, New England’s ability to control the game offensively could force Smith into more obvious passing situations, creating additional sack opportunities. I’m comfortable starting the Patriots as a strong Week 6 streaming option, particularly if Gonzalez is available.
Kansas City Chiefs DEF
Kansas City has been one of the league’s more dependable defenses through five weeks, ranking eighth in defensive EPA per play (-0.035). The Chiefs have been particularly effective against the run, allowing -0.145 EPA per rushing attempt while holding opponents to a 33.7% rushing success rate. That ability to limit early-down production is important because it forces opposing quarterbacks into more predictable passing situations. Kansas City also enters Week 6 coming off its bye, giving the defense additional time to prepare for a divisional matchup against Los Angeles.
The Chargers have been the most favorable matchup for fantasy defenses this season, allowing a league-high 10.2 D/ST fantasy points per game. Los Angeles has struggled with offensive-line injuries and inconsistent offensive production, creating opportunities for opposing defenses to generate sacks and turnovers. That’s particularly concerning against a Kansas City defense capable of limiting the rushing attack and forcing Justin Herbert into obvious passing situations. If Patrick Mahomes and the Chiefs establish an early lead, Herbert could be forced to throw even more frequently. With Los Angeles repeatedly allowing strong defensive fantasy performances, Kansas City is one of my favorite D/ST starts in Week 6.
Indianapolis Colts DEF
Indianapolis hasn’t been an especially impressive defense this season, but its Week 6 matchup creates an opportunity for a productive fantasy performance. The Colts rank 26th in defensive EPA per play (+0.067), allowing positive EPA against both the pass and run. Those numbers are concerning, particularly because Indianapolis hasn’t consistently prevented opposing offenses from sustaining drives. However, fantasy defenses don’t necessarily need elite efficiency numbers to produce strong performances. Sacks, turnovers and limiting points can make an otherwise average defense worth starting when the opposing offense is struggling.
Tennessee has been one of the NFL’s least productive offenses, averaging just 11.6 points per game through five weeks. Cam Ward has thrown only three touchdowns, while the Titans have struggled with offensive-line play and inconsistent passing production. Tennessee has also allowed 8.2 fantasy points per game to opposing defenses, the seventh-most in the league. Ward’s inexperience creates additional opportunities for Indianapolis to generate pressure and capitalize on mistakes, particularly if the Titans fall behind early. I’m not treating the Colts as a defense worth starting every week, but this is exactly the type of matchup I’m willing to target. Indianapolis is a strong Week 6 streaming option.
Defenses to Sit
Cleveland Browns DEF
Cleveland has a capable defensive front, but its Week 6 matchup makes the Browns difficult to trust in fantasy football. The defense ranks 13th in EPA per play (-0.020), demonstrating relatively balanced performance against both the pass and run. Cleveland has also shown the ability to generate pressure, including a five-sack performance against Pittsburgh earlier this season. However, the Browns’ offensive struggles have created additional problems for the defense, particularly when Cleveland falls behind and opposing offenses can control the game.
Baltimore presents a difficult matchup because its offense has enough talent to generate explosive plays and overcome occasional negative drives. The Ravens have allowed just 4.0 fantasy points per game to opposing defenses, making them one of the less favorable opponents for D/ST production. Cleveland’s pass rush gives it some upside, but Baltimore’s ability to score quickly creates significant risk. I’m also concerned that the Browns’ offense could struggle to sustain drives, forcing their defense to spend additional time on the field. Cleveland remains a talented defensive unit, but I’m keeping the Browns on the bench against Baltimore.
Philadelphia Eagles DEF
Philadelphia has been one of the more disappointing fantasy defenses through five weeks, particularly because its defensive talent hasn’t consistently translated into sacks, turnovers or scoring prevention. The Eagles rank 24th in defensive EPA per play (+0.052), allowing +0.133 EPA per dropback. Injuries along the defensive front could make matters worse, with Jalyx Hunt not expected to play and Jonathan Greenard’s availability uncertain. Philadelphia’s situation has become even more concerning with Jalen Hurts ruled out against Carolina after doctors discovered a superficial blood clot in his calf. Tanner McKee is positioned to start, while injuries to Saquon Barkley and DeVonta Smith could leave the Eagles without several of their most important offensive weapons.
Carolina has allowed just 3.8 fantasy points per game to opposing defenses, the seventh-fewest in the NFL. That’s concerning because the Panthers haven’t consistently provided opponents with the sacks and turnovers needed for strong fantasy performances. Philadelphia could certainly limit Carolina’s scoring, but the Eagles haven’t demonstrated enough defensive production to justify trusting them in this matchup. With Hurts unavailable, the offense could struggle to sustain drives, creating additional possessions and unfavorable field position for Philadelphia’s defense. McKee doesn’t necessarily need to play poorly for those concerns to materialize, particularly with several important offensive players injured. With better streaming options available, I’m keeping the Eagles on the bench in Week 6.
San Francisco 49ers DEF
San Francisco has been one of the NFL’s best defenses through five weeks, ranking third in defensive EPA per play (-0.076). The 49ers have been particularly impressive against the run, allowing -0.215 EPA per rushing attempt, the third-best mark in the league. That defensive strength has contributed to their undefeated start, although Seattle demonstrated in Week 5 that opponents can still generate substantial scoring production against San Francisco. The 49ers remain talented enough to create sacks and turnovers against almost anyone, but this week’s matchup presents more risk than usual.
Washington has allowed just 4.2 fantasy points per game to opposing defenses, making the Commanders one of the less favorable matchups for D/ST production. Their passing attack has enough playmakers to generate explosive gains, and Washington has generally avoided giving opposing defenses substantial fantasy production. San Francisco’s run defense could force the Commanders into more passing situations, creating some opportunities for pressure. However, I’m concerned about Washington’s ability to move the football and limit negative plays. I’m certainly not dropping the 49ers, but I’d rather stream a defense facing a more vulnerable offense in Week 6.
Kickers to Start
Eddy Piñeiro, K (SF)
Eddy Piñeiro has benefited from playing in one of the NFL’s more productive offenses, but his accuracy has been a concern through five weeks. He’s converted just five of eight field-goal attempts, a 62.5% success rate, including a miss against Seattle in Week 5. However, San Francisco continues providing scoring opportunities, and Piñeiro’s 44-yard field goal against the Seahawks demonstrated his ability to contribute in important situations. The 49ers’ undefeated start and consistent offensive production give him a favorable environment for fantasy football.
Washington has allowed 12.0 fantasy points per game to opposing kickers, tied for the second-most in the NFL. That’s an extremely appealing matchup for a San Francisco offense capable of consistently reaching scoring range. Piñeiro’s missed kicks introduce legitimate risk, but the opportunity for multiple attempts makes him worth starting. I’m comfortable using him in Week 6, particularly if the 49ers continue moving the football effectively against Washington’s struggling defense.
Harrison Butker, K (KC)
Harrison Butker remains an appealing fantasy option because of Kansas City’s ability to consistently create scoring opportunities. Playing alongside Patrick Mahomes gives him a strong offensive environment, while his established range provides additional upside when drives stall outside the red zone. However, the Chiefs’ ability to finish possessions with touchdowns can occasionally limit his field-goal attempts. That’s why I’m more interested in the matchup and potential kicking opportunities than simply projecting Kansas City to score a substantial number of points.
The Chargers have allowed 9.4 fantasy points per game to opposing kickers, making them a favorable matchup for Butker. Los Angeles has been effective defensively on a per-play basis, ranking sixth in defensive EPA, but has still allowed opponents to generate kicking opportunities. That combination could benefit Butker if Kansas City consistently moves the football without finishing every possession with a touchdown. With Mahomes leading the offense and a favorable divisional matchup, I’m starting Butker as a dependable Week 6 option.
Chris Boswell, K (PIT)
Chris Boswell has converted nine of 12 field-goal attempts through five weeks, including both opportunities against Indianapolis last Sunday. His three misses are concerning, but Pittsburgh continues getting him into scoring range, and his ability to convert from beyond 50 yards gives him valuable fantasy upside. Boswell has connected from as far as 56 yards this season, demonstrating that his range remains an asset. The Steelers have also shown signs of offensive improvement with Aaron Rodgers, although injuries to several receiving options could make it more difficult to consistently finish drives.
Tampa Bay has allowed 12.0 fantasy points per game to opposing kickers, tied for the second-most in the NFL. That’s one of the strongest matchups available at the position, particularly for a kicker capable of converting attempts from beyond 50 yards. The Buccaneers have been effective defensively in certain situations, potentially forcing Pittsburgh to settle for field goals rather than touchdowns. Boswell’s early missed kicks create some risk, but the combination of range, opportunity and matchup makes him a strong Week 6 start.
Kickers to Sit
Tyler Bass, K (BUF)
Tyler Bass benefits from playing alongside Josh Allen in one of the NFL’s most explosive offenses, but that doesn’t always translate into dependable fantasy production. When the Bills consistently finish drives in the end zone, Bass can be left relying primarily on extra points rather than the field-goal attempts that create significant fantasy upside.
Las Vegas has allowed just 5.6 fantasy points per game to opposing kickers, the fourth-fewest in the league. That’s concerning because Buffalo could score plenty of points without giving Bass multiple field-goal opportunities. The Raiders have struggled defensively, but opposing kickers haven’t consistently benefited from those struggles. I’m not questioning Buffalo’s ability to move the football; I’m questioning how many drives will end in field-goal attempts. Bass is a lower-priority fantasy option in Week 6.
Nick Folk, K (ATL)
Nick Folk has been reasonably productive through five weeks, converting nine of 12 field-goal attempts, including all three of his attempts against Baltimore in Week 5. That recent performance is encouraging, particularly because Atlanta has demonstrated an ability to create scoring opportunities even when its offense struggles with consistency. Michael Penix Jr. also practiced fully Wednesday after suffering a rib injury, putting him in position to start against Chicago. His expected return should provide some stability for the Falcons’ offense.
However, Chicago has allowed just 6.0 fantasy points per game to opposing kickers, the fifth-fewest in the NFL. That’s a difficult matchup for Folk, especially with Atlanta’s field-goal opportunities remaining somewhat inconsistent. Penix’s return could improve the offense, but it doesn’t guarantee multiple kicking attempts against a defense that has limited fantasy production at the position. Despite Folk’s perfect Week 5 performance, I’m looking elsewhere for a more favorable matchup.
Daniel Carlson, K (NO)
Daniel Carlson has the range and experience to produce strong fantasy performances, but New Orleans hasn’t consistently provided an appealing kicking environment. The Saints’ offensive inconsistency makes it difficult to project how frequently they’ll reach scoring range, particularly when the passing game struggles to sustain drives. Unfavorable game scripts can also eliminate potential field-goal attempts if New Orleans falls behind and becomes more aggressive on fourth downs.
The Giants have allowed just 4.6 fantasy points per game to opposing kickers, the fewest in the NFL. That’s an extremely difficult matchup for Carlson, especially when New Orleans hasn’t consistently generated dependable scoring opportunities. The Saints could certainly move the football at times, but the Giants have limited opposing kickers throughout the season. With the combination of uncertain field-goal volume and the league’s toughest kicker matchup, I’m keeping Carlson on the bench in Week 6.
