Making the right start ’em, sit ’em decisions can be the difference between winning and losing your fantasy football matchup each week. Throughout the 2026 NFL season, we’ll break down the best fantasy football starts and sits at quarterback, running back, wide receiver, tight end, defense, and kicker. Using matchups, usage trends, advanced stats, injuries, and scoring opportunities, this weekly Start ’Em, Sit ’Em guide will highlight the players you should trust in your lineup and the ones you may want to leave on the bench.
Want your start/sit questions answered within minutes? Join the Blitz Community for free fantasy football advice all season long.
Quarterbacks to Start
Jacoby Brissett ARI
Jacoby Brissett has become a legitimate fantasy streaming option because Arizona is giving him enough passing opportunities to overcome his inconsistent efficiency. Through four games, Brissett has completed an average of 25.8 passes on 38 attempts for 204.5 yards, 1.5 touchdowns, and one interception per game. Those numbers aren’t particularly impressive on their own, but the willingness to increase his workload when Arizona falls behind is important. Brissett attempted 52 passes against San Francisco in Week 3 and delivered 25.6 fantasy points, demonstrating that he can produce a strong fantasy performance when the Cardinals need to become aggressive. His value isn’t built around elite passing efficiency or rushing production; it’s built around Arizona’s willingness to put the football in his hands.
Detroit gives me a reason to expect another relatively aggressive passing approach. The Lions have struggled to prevent opposing offenses from sustaining drives and creating explosive plays through the air, which is particularly concerning against an Arizona offense built around Trey McBride and its receiving weapons. McBride gives Brissett a dependable option in the middle of the field, while Arizona’s other receivers provide opportunities to attack outside the numbers. The biggest question is whether the Cardinals can turn their passing volume into touchdowns rather than simply accumulating short completions. Detroit has surrendered 11 passing touchdowns through four games, so the scoring opportunities should be available. I’m not expecting Brissett to suddenly become one of the league’s most efficient passers, but the matchup and potential for another high-volume performance make him one of my favorite Week 5 streaming options.
Jordan Love GB
Jordan Love has been a frustrating quarterback to evaluate because his passing volume and touchdown production have been much better than his overall efficiency. Through four games, Love has completed 87 of 154 passes for 1,041 yards, eight touchdowns, and three interceptions. He’s averaging 38.5 attempts and 260.3 passing yards per game, but his 56.5% completion rate and 6.8 yards per attempt illustrate how much production he’s leaving on the field. His completion percentage over expected is approximately seven points below expectation, while his passing EPA per play has been close to neutral. Love also hasn’t provided meaningful rushing production, making his eight passing touchdowns particularly important. He’s throwing enough to generate strong fantasy performances, but he needs to become more accurate to consistently capitalize on those opportunities.
Chicago’s defense has improved considerably since its difficult opening game, which makes this a more challenging matchup than the Bears’ early-season reputation suggests. The Bears have allowed only 776 passing yards and four passing touchdowns through four games, with opposing quarterbacks completing just 58.6% of their attempts. They’ve also held three consecutive opponents to 12 points or fewer, including a Jets offense that managed only 157 total yards last week. I’m not ignoring those numbers, but Green Bay’s offensive approach gives Love a realistic opportunity to overcome the matchup. The Packers are averaging nearly 39 passing attempts per game, and Love has thrown two touchdowns in every appearance despite his accuracy struggles. Chicago has been effective limiting passing production, but I still trust Green Bay to create enough scoring opportunities for Love to deliver a usable fantasy performance. He’s a lower-end QB1 for me this week.
Aaron Rodgers PIT
Aaron Rodgers has completely changed the outlook of Pittsburgh’s passing offense over the past two weeks. After throwing for only 408 yards and one touchdown across his first two games, Rodgers has produced 591 passing yards, six touchdowns and three interceptions in consecutive performances against Cincinnati and Cleveland. He completed 19 of 34 passes for 292 yards and three touchdowns against the Bengals before following that with 299 yards and another three scores on 40 attempts against the Browns. Through four games, Rodgers has thrown for 999 yards and seven touchdowns while averaging 38.3 attempts per contest. PFF has charted seven big-time throws and four turnover-worthy plays, along with a 9.2-yard average depth of target. The interceptions remain concerning, but Pittsburgh has clearly become more willing to attack downfield.
Indianapolis is an appealing opponent for a quarterback whose fantasy value depends almost entirely on passing production. The Colts have allowed 1,105 passing yards and six passing touchdowns through four games, an average of 276.3 yards per contest. Opposing quarterbacks have averaged 8.1 yards per attempt and a 98.4 passer rating against Indianapolis, while the defense has generated only nine sacks. PFF also notes that the Colts rank 25th in blitz frequency, which could help Rodgers operate without facing additional pressure packages. That’s particularly important after Cleveland sacked him five times last week. Rodgers still offers essentially no rushing floor, and PFF projects him for 236.7 passing yards and 1.8 touchdowns, so I’m not treating him as a guaranteed QB1. However, his recent passing volume and Indianapolis’ defensive weaknesses make him a strong streaming option in Week 5.
Quarterbacks to Sit
Jalen Hurts PHI
Jalen Hurts is becoming one of the more uncomfortable fantasy decisions because his passing production has been nonexistent. Through four games, Hurts has completed 68 of 114 passes for 713 yards, seven touchdowns, and three interceptions while adding 105 rushing yards and one rushing touchdown. He’s averaging only 178.3 passing yards per game, and his most recent performance against the Rams was particularly concerning. Hurts completed just 12 of 27 passes for 93 yards and two touchdowns, averaging only 3.4 yards per attempt. That’s now consecutive games with fewer than 155 passing yards, and his rushing production hasn’t consistently compensated for those limitations. The touchdowns have kept him fantasy-relevant, but the underlying yardage is becoming difficult to overlook.
Jacksonville presents another challenge for a Philadelphia offense that hasn’t consistently generated efficient passing production. The Jaguars have been one of the more difficult quarterback matchups through four weeks, and Philadelphia will also be traveling to London for this contest. The supporting cast introduces additional uncertainty, with Saquon Barkley dealing with a hamstring injury and DeVonta Smith missing Wednesday’s practice. Those situations could change how Philadelphia approaches the game, particularly if the Eagles need to rely more heavily on Hurts around the goal line. That rushing-touchdown potential is exactly why I’m not treating him as an automatic bench in every league. However, I’m concerned about trusting a quarterback averaging fewer than 180 passing yards against a defense that has consistently limited opposing fantasy quarterbacks. If I have another legitimate QB1 with a stronger matchup, I’m willing to pivot away from Hurts this week.
Kyler Murray MIN
Kyler Murray’s transition to Minnesota has been considerably more frustrating than I expected, particularly because his rushing production hasn’t provided the fantasy floor we’ve historically associated with him. Through three appearances, Murray has accounted for only one passing touchdown and two interceptions while rushing for 42 yards on the season. That’s just 14 rushing yards per game, a disappointing number for a quarterback whose mobility has traditionally been one of his biggest fantasy advantages. His Week 4 performance against Miami was more encouraging from a passing-volume perspective, as Murray completed 27 of 37 attempts for 247 yards. However, he failed to throw a touchdown, meaning even an efficient 73% completion rate wasn’t enough to produce a particularly useful fantasy performance. The passing volume is improving, but the scoring production hasn’t followed.
New Orleans isn’t a defense I’m particularly afraid of, which makes Murray’s individual performance the primary reason I’m sitting him. The Saints have allowed 912 passing yards and seven passing touchdowns through four games, with opponents completing 84 of 123 attempts. They’ve also struggled against the run, allowing 591 rushing yards and nine rushing touchdowns. That creates opportunities for Minnesota’s offense, but Murray hasn’t demonstrated that he can consistently take advantage of favorable situations. His 247 passing yards against Miami were encouraging, yet he still finished without a touchdown and contributed very little as a runner. The matchup gives him a path toward improvement, but I’m not comfortable projecting a breakout based solely on New Orleans’ defensive struggles. Until Murray begins creating more rushing opportunities or consistently converting passing volume into touchdowns, I’d rather leave him on the bench in traditional one-quarterback leagues.
Jayden Daniels WAS
Jayden Daniels is one of the more difficult quarterbacks to evaluate entering Week 5, particularly after missing Washington’s last two games with a dislocated left elbow. Through two appearances, Daniels has completed 29 of 51 passes for 260 yards, three touchdowns, and no interceptions while adding 100 rushing yards on 12 attempts. His 50 rushing yards per appearance demonstrate the upside he can provide with his legs, but the passing production has been underwhelming. He managed only 164 passing yards against Philadelphia in Week 1 before throwing for 96 yards against Dallas in an injury-shortened Week 2. Daniels is now expected to return against the Giants after practicing fully on Wednesday, although he’ll be wearing a protective brace on the same elbow he’s injured twice.
The Giants aren’t a matchup I’m particularly concerned about, especially with Washington playing at home against a divisional opponent Daniels has defeated in all three of his previous meetings. However, I’m hesitant to trust him immediately after another significant elbow injury. Washington’s offensive line has struggled with injuries and inconsistent play, while Terry McLaurin and Stefon Diggs both missed Wednesday’s practice with hamstring injuries. Those potential absences would make an already difficult return even more challenging. Daniels has averaged 8.3 yards per rushing attempt this season, but I’m not willing to assume he’ll maintain that aggressiveness while protecting his elbow. The rushing upside makes him difficult to bench, but with limited passing production, an unsettled supporting cast, and uncertainty surrounding his mobility, I’d rather give him another week before trusting him as my fantasy starter.
Running Backs to Start
Emanuel Wilson SEA
Emanuel Wilson has become one of the more appealing short-term fantasy starters following Seattle’s injuries at running back, and his Week 4 performance demonstrated what he can accomplish with a featured workload. Wilson handled 21 carries for 81 yards and a touchdown against the Chargers while adding three receptions for 39 yards and another score. That gave him 120 scrimmage yards, two touchdowns and 27 PPR fantasy points, finishing as the RB6 for the week. More importantly, Wilson played 36 of Seattle’s 60 offensive snaps and handled 24 of the team’s 32 running back touches. With Jadarian Price on injured reserve, Wilson has a realistic opportunity to maintain a substantial workload, although Zach Charbonnet’s return to practice and the addition of Joe Mixon to the practice squad introduce some uncertainty beyond this week.
San Francisco presents an interesting matchup because the 49ers have allowed 25.6 PPR fantasy points per game to opposing running backs, including 367 rushing yards and 207 receiving yards through four games. However, their -0.06 defensive rushing EPA per play is right in the middle of the pack. That’s why Wilson’s receiving involvement is particularly encouraging. The 49ers have allowed 31 receptions to opposing running backs, creating opportunities for Wilson to remain productive even if rushing efficiency is inconsistent. He’s already handled 21 carries in two separate games this season, and Seattle has demonstrated a willingness to feature him when the backfield is depleted. Charbonnet’s practice window introduces some uncertainty, but assuming Wilson maintains his current role, I’m comfortable starting him as an RB2 with additional PPR upside.
Kyle Monangai CHI
Kyle Monangai delivered one of the most impressive running back performances of Week 4, and the circumstances surrounding his breakout make him particularly interesting entering this divisional matchup. Monangai rushed for 146 yards and two touchdowns on 30 carries against the Jets while adding one reception for four yards, finishing with 28 PPR fantasy points. He also forced eight missed tackles and handled 31 total touches, showing he was consistently creating additional yardage rather than simply benefiting from favorable blocking. The biggest development came after D’Andre Swift fumbled in the third quarter. Swift didn’t receive another touch for the remainder of the game, while Monangai handled 18 of his 30 carries after the turnover. That doesn’t guarantee a permanent depth-chart change, but it demonstrates that Chicago is willing to feature Monangai when he’s producing, and Swift is making mistakes.
Green Bay is one of the more appealing matchups for opposing running backs, having surrendered 29.7 PPR fantasy points per game to the position through four weeks. The Packers have allowed 455 rushing yards and seven rushing touchdowns to running backs, along with another receiving score. Their -0.02 defensive rushing EPA per play suggests they’ve been relatively close to league average in efficiency, but the rushing touchdowns and fantasy production allowed create significant upside. Monangai’s injury situation entering the week causes some uncertainty. Nevertheless, Monangai’s 30-carry breakout and Swift’s recent ball-security problems create a realistic opportunity for an expanded role. Assuming he’s healthy enough to maintain a meaningful workload, I’m comfortable starting Monangai as an RB2 or strong flex option.
Omarion Hampton LAC
Omarion Hampton is becoming increasingly difficult to trust as a long-term fantasy asset, but I’m willing to give him another opportunity in Week 5 because the matchup is considerably more favorable than his recent workload suggests. Hampton has handled 59 carries for 238 yards and three rushing touchdowns through four games, averaging 4.0 yards per attempt. However, his playing time has declined in three consecutive weeks, falling to just 35% of the offensive snaps against Seattle in Week 4. He finished that game with nine carries for 45 yards and a touchdown while adding two receptions for eight yards. The committee involving Keaton Mitchell and Jadarian Price remains a significant concern, but Hampton has still demonstrated encouraging individual ability. According to PFF, he’s forced 15 missed tackles while averaging 3.1 yards after contact per attempt, showing that it hasn’t all been bad for the second year running back this season.
Denver is exactly the type of matchup where I’m willing to overlook some of those long-term concerns. The Broncos have allowed 27.8 PPR fantasy points per game to opposing running backs, including 454 rushing yards, 177 receiving yards, and four total touchdowns through four games. They have allowed +0.08 defensive rushing EPA per play, which is 2nd worst in the NFL. That’s particularly appealing for Hampton because he’s continued receiving valuable red-zone opportunities despite the Chargers reducing his overall workload. His 15 forced missed tackles provide another reason to believe he can capitalize on Denver’s defensive struggles without needing a massive increase in touches. I don’t suddenly expect Hampton to dominate the backfield, and the declining snap share remains a major concern for his rest-of-season outlook. However, with injuries and bye weeks limiting fantasy managers’ alternatives, this is a matchup where I’m comfortable starting him as an RB2 or flex option.
Running Backs to Sit
Will Shipley PHI
Will Shipley could see his largest workload of the season against Jacksonville, but I’m not convinced that increased opportunity will automatically translate into useful fantasy production. Saquon Barkley is dealing with a hamstring injury, while Tank Bigsby has been placed on injured reserve following core muscle surgery. That leaves Shipley with a realistic opportunity to lead Philadelphia’s backfield, although Dameon Pierce could also be involved after being promoted from the practice squad. Shipley has spent most of his NFL career operating in a complementary role, and he hasn’t established a consistent track record of producing as a featured runner. The potential increase in carries is encouraging, but his limited experience handling a substantial NFL workload makes it difficult to project the same efficiency Philadelphia typically receives from Barkley.
Jacksonville makes this an especially difficult situation for a running back whose fantasy appeal is almost entirely based on a potential increase in touches. The Jaguars have allowed only 17.8 PPR fantasy points per game to opposing running backs, including just 190 rushing yards and one rushing touchdown through four games. Their reported -0.13 defensive rushing EPA per play also indicates that opposing offenses have struggled to generate positive value on the ground. Philadelphia is coming off a game in which its offense managed only 172 total yards against the Rams, creating additional concerns about how consistently the Eagles can sustain drives. Shipley could receive enough touches to remain relevant in deeper leagues, but I don’t trust those opportunities to translate into strong production against one of the league’s more effective run defenses. He’s a desperation volume-based flex rather than someone I’m comfortable starting.
David Montgomery HOU
David Montgomery has become one of the more disappointing fantasy running backs through the opening month, especially considering how productive he was in Houston’s season opener. Montgomery scored three touchdowns in Week 1, immediately creating optimism about his role in the Texans’ offense. However, that production hasn’t carried over into the following three games. Since Week 2, Montgomery has reportedly averaged approximately 10 touches and fewer than 40 scrimmage yards per contest, while his fantasy production has fallen to roughly five PPR points per game. He’s continued playing a meaningful percentage of Houston’s offensive snaps, but the actual opportunities haven’t been nearly as valuable as that playing time suggests. His receiving involvement has also been limited, leaving him heavily dependent on rushing production and touchdowns to deliver useful fantasy performances. The Texans’ continued involvement of Woody Marks makes it even more difficult to project Montgomery for a substantial increase in touches.
Tennessee isn’t an impossible matchup for opposing running backs, but the defensive numbers aren’t favorable enough for me to overlook Montgomery’s declining production. The Titans have allowed 21.4 PPR fantasy points per game to the position, including 399 rushing yards and three rushing touchdowns through four games. Their -0.07 defensive rushing EPA per play suggests they’ve been reasonably effective at limiting rushing efficiency, even though opponents have accumulated production through volume. That distinction matters for Montgomery because he hasn’t been receiving enough touches to consistently overcome inefficient rushing performances. The potential for a short-yardage touchdown is always there, but I’m not willing to chase his three-score Week 1 performance when the recent opportunity and production have been so limited. Montgomery remains a touchdown-dependent flex I’d prefer to avoid this week.
Cam Skattebo NYG
Cam Skattebo has maintained a relatively dependable workload in New York’s backfield, but his individual rushing efficiency and recent fantasy production haven’t been particularly encouraging. Through four games, Skattebo has handled 68 carries for 235 yards and one touchdown while adding eight receptions for 67 yards. He’s averaging only 3.5 yards per carry and 11.1 PPR fantasy points per game, placing him around RB24 through the opening month. Those numbers are disappointing considering he’s received at least 16 touches in every appearance. His most recent performance against Arizona was particularly frustrating, producing only 7.6 PPR points despite receiving 19 opportunities. The workload is there, but Skattebo hasn’t consistently generated explosive rushing plays or enough scoring opportunities to turn that volume into dependable RB2 production. He’s also dealing with a shoulder injury, adding another concern for a player whose value depends heavily on physical rushing volume.
Washington is a considerably more difficult rushing matchup than its overall defensive reputation might suggest. The Commanders have allowed only 16.3 PPR fantasy points per game to opposing running backs, including 294 rushing yards and two rushing touchdowns through four games. Their reported -0.10 defensive rushing EPA per play also suggests they’ve been effective at preventing opponents from consistently generating positive rushing value. That’s concerning for Skattebo because he’s already averaging just 3.5 yards per carry, meaning he’ll likely need substantial volume or a touchdown to deliver a strong fantasy performance. New York also enters the matchup as a road underdog, creating the possibility of a negative game script that forces the Giants to become more aggressive through the air. Skattebo’s receiving involvement provides some protection, but averaging only two receptions per game isn’t enough to guarantee a strong PPR floor. With a difficult matchup, limited rushing efficiency, and uncertainty surrounding his shoulder, I’d prefer to sit Skattebo if I have another legitimate RB2 option.
Wide Receivers to Start
Carnell Tate TEN
Carnell Tate is beginning to establish himself as the focal point of Tennessee’s passing offense, and his Week 4 breakout was exactly what I wanted to see from the rookie. Tate caught nine of 12 targets for 145 yards against Baltimore, giving him 22 receptions for 268 yards on 32 targets through four games. He’s now received 21 targets over his last two appearances, with his 32 targets ranking 10th among qualified wide receivers and his 268 receiving yards ranking 14th. Tate hasn’t scored a receiving touchdown yet, but I’m encouraged by how consistently Cam Ward is looking in his direction. The target volume is becoming difficult to ignore, particularly for a rookie playing in an offense that will frequently need to throw while trailing.
Houston is one of the best matchups Tate could ask for entering Week 5. The Texans have allowed 830 receiving yards and six touchdowns to opposing wide receivers through four games, averaging 207.5 yards and 1.5 touchdowns per contest. They’ve also surrendered approximately 44.6 PPR fantasy points per game to the position, creating an appealing opportunity for Tennessee’s emerging top receiving option. Houston plays zone coverage at one of the league’s highest rates, which is encouraging given Tate’s involvement against zone looks. Tennessee could also find itself trailing, creating additional passing volume for Ward and his primary target. I’m not expecting another 145-yard performance automatically, but Tate’s expanding role and favorable matchup make him a strong WR3 with legitimate WR2 upside.
Denzel Boston CLE
Denzel Boston has quietly become one of the more productive rookie wide receivers through the opening month, and his ability to generate explosive plays has been particularly impressive. Boston has caught 13 of 22 targets for 284 yards and two touchdowns, averaging an outstanding 21.8 yards per reception. He’s also generated 108 yards after the catch without recording a drop, while his 18.0-yard average depth of target demonstrates how frequently Cleveland is using him to attack downfield. According to PFF, Boston owns a 77.6 receiving grade, ranking 19th among qualified wide receivers. He’s played more than 92% of Cleveland’s offensive snaps and accounts for approximately half of the team’s air yards. The target volume isn’t overwhelming at just 5.5 opportunities per game, but his downfield role gives him the ability to generate meaningful fantasy production without needing double-digit targets.
The Jets have allowed only 28.3 fantasy points per game to opposing wide receivers, making this a difficult matchup on paper. However, Boston’s role in Cleveland’s offense gives him a realistic opportunity to produce even when the passing game isn’t particularly efficient. His 284 receiving yards have come on just 13 receptions, demonstrating how much of his production comes from explosive gains rather than sustained short-area volume. He’s also played more than 92% of the offensive snaps, giving him opportunities to remain involved regardless of game script. The concern is that Cleveland hasn’t consistently generated enough passing volume to guarantee Boston a substantial number of targets, and one or two missed downfield connections could significantly impact his fantasy output. Nevertheless, I’m willing to bet on his established role and ability to generate explosive plays. Boston is a worthwhile flex start despite the challenging matchup.
DK Metcalf PIT
DK Metcalf finally delivered the kind of performance fantasy managers have been waiting for in Week 4, catching five passes for 115 yards against Cleveland. That outing was particularly encouraging because he’d managed only 98 receiving yards across Pittsburgh’s first three games, despite playing nearly every offensive snap. Through four games, Metcalf has caught 16 passes for 213 yards and one touchdown on 32 targets, averaging eight opportunities per contest. His 96.3% snap share demonstrates that playing time isn’t a concern, and his Week 4 performance showed how productive he can be when Aaron Rodgers connects with him downfield. Metcalf recorded three receptions of at least 20 yards against Cleveland, including a 43-yard gain. Pittsburgh’s passing offense has also become considerably more aggressive, with Rodgers throwing for 591 yards and six touchdowns over the past two games.
Indianapolis presents an appealing opportunity for that momentum to continue, although the matchup is more complicated than the overall fantasy numbers suggest. The Colts have allowed 35.7 fantasy points per game to opposing wide receivers, including 44 receptions for 706 yards through four games. That works out to 176.5 receiving yards per contest, while Indianapolis has also surrendered more than 1,100 total passing yards. The Colts have been more effective against perimeter receivers on an efficiency-adjusted basis, which is a legitimate concern for Metcalf. However, Pittsburgh’s increased passing volume and his 96.3% snap share give him opportunities to overcome that defensive resistance. Rodgers has demonstrated a willingness to attack downfield, and Metcalf remains one of his primary options when the Steelers need an explosive play. I’m treating him as a WR2 or strong flex option rather than assuming another 100-yard performance.
Wide Receivers to Sit
Deebo Samuel Sr. SF
Deebo Samuel has remained fantasy-relevant through the opening month, but his underlying receiving involvement makes me uncomfortable trusting him against a difficult opponent. Through four games, Samuel has caught 14 passes for 185 yards and three touchdowns while averaging only 4.3 targets per contest. He’s also contributed seven carries for 74 rushing yards, giving him an additional source of fantasy production that shouldn’t be overlooked. However, Samuel has played approximately 60% of San Francisco’s offensive snaps, a concerning number for a player whose fantasy value has historically benefited from consistent involvement throughout the offense. His three receiving touchdowns have helped compensate for the limited target volume, but averaging just 46.3 receiving yards per game leaves relatively little margin for error when he doesn’t find the end zone.
Seattle is one of the worst matchups for a wide receiver relying on limited receiving opportunities. The Seahawks have allowed only 21.5 fantasy points per game to opposing wide receivers, the second-lowest total entering Week 5. They’ve consistently limited explosive receiving production, making it difficult for opponents to generate meaningful yardage without sustained target volume. Samuel’s rushing involvement gives him another path toward fantasy relevance, but seven carries through four games isn’t enough for me to overlook his limited receiving role. San Francisco also has multiple offensive weapons competing for opportunities, and Samuel’s current snap share makes his weekly involvement difficult to predict. He can always create a big play with the football in his hands, but I’d rather avoid relying on that outcome against one of the league’s most effective pass defenses.
Dontayvion Wicks PHI
Dontayvion Wicks has demonstrated some big-play ability since joining Philadelphia, but his recent production makes him a difficult player to trust entering Week 5. Through four games, Wicks has caught 12 of 20 targets for 197 yards and one touchdown, averaging 16.4 yards per reception. However, 147 of those yards came during his first two games, when he recorded a 64-yard reception against Washington and followed it with 74 yards against Tennessee. Over his last two appearances, Wicks has managed only five receptions for 50 yards without a touchdown. His Week 4 performance was particularly disappointing, as he caught three of five targets for just 18 yards against the Rams despite DeVonta Smith being sidelined. According to PFF, Wicks owns a 67.1 receiving grade, ranking 49th among qualified receivers, while his 13.2-yard average depth of target demonstrates that Philadelphia is still giving him opportunities downfield.
Jacksonville has allowed 38.7 fantasy points per game to opposing wide receivers, making this a matchup that initially looks appealing. However, the Jaguars have surrendered only one receiving touchdown to the position through four games, and Wicks hasn’t demonstrated enough consistency to make me confident he’ll capitalize on the available opportunities. DeVonta Smith’s hamstring injury and Hollywood Brown’s ankle injury could increase Wicks’ involvement, but that’s exactly what makes his three-catch, 18-yard performance against Los Angeles concerning. Philadelphia was already missing both receivers, yet Wicks still failed to generate meaningful production. The Eagles also managed just 172 total yards in that game, raising additional concerns about the offense’s ability to support multiple fantasy-relevant receiving options. Wicks has enough downfield ability to break off a substantial gain, but I’m not willing to rely on an explosive play when he’s averaged just 25 receiving yards over his last two games. Even with the favorable matchup, I’m leaving him on the bench in Week 5.
Malik Washington MIA
Malik Washington has received enough opportunities to remain on the fantasy radar, but the production hasn’t consistently justified a starting spot. Through four games, Washington has averaged seven targets, 4.3 receptions and 54.8 receiving yards per contest without scoring a touchdown. That puts him at approximately 219 receiving yards on 17 catches, despite playing nearly 86% of Miami’s offensive snaps. His involvement is encouraging, particularly because he’s regularly on the field and receiving opportunities within the passing game. However, the lack of touchdowns has limited his weekly fantasy ceiling, and his average of 9.8 PPR fantasy points per game makes him difficult to trust outside deeper formats. Miami has also struggled to consistently generate productive passing performances, leaving Washington dependent on volume rather than an especially efficient offensive environment.
Cincinnati isn’t necessarily an overwhelming matchup, but the Bengals have done a respectable job limiting fantasy production from opposing wide receivers. They’ve allowed approximately 29.1 fantasy points per game to the position, placing them near the middle of the league rather than among the defenses I’d actively target. That’s an important distinction because Washington’s fantasy value depends on converting consistent targets into receptions and yardage rather than generating explosive plays or touchdowns. He’s averaging just 54.8 receiving yards per game and hasn’t found the end zone, meaning another four- or five-catch performance could easily leave fantasy managers disappointed. The snap share and target volume are encouraging for his long-term role, but I’m not comfortable relying on him as a Week 5 starter when more explosive receiving options are available.
Tight Ends to Start
Mike Gesicki CIN
Mike Gesicki has made the most of his opportunities in Cincinnati’s passing offense, catching 11 of 15 targets for 155 yards and three touchdowns through four games. He’s averaging 14.1 yards per reception and 10.3 yards per target, demonstrating his ability to generate meaningful production without commanding substantial volume. However, fewer than four targets per game typically isn’t enough to provide a dependable fantasy floor. Cincinnati’s injury situation could change that, with Ja’Marr Chase dealing with a concussion and Tee Higgins battling an adductor injury. Gesicki has historically produced at a top-12 tight end pace in PPR points per game when either receiver has been unavailable, making him particularly interesting if the Bengals need to redistribute targets.
Miami presents an appealing opportunity for Gesicki, having allowed 19.3 PPR fantasy points per game to opposing tight ends through four weeks. The Dolphins have also surrendered the most yards per target and fifth-most fantasy points per opportunity to the position, highlighting how efficiently opposing tight ends have produced against this defense. Those weaknesses align well with Gesicki’s ability to generate yardage downfield and capitalize on scoring opportunities. Cincinnati could also be forced to feature him more frequently if Chase or Higgins is unavailable, creating a path toward increased receiving volume. I’m not expecting Gesicki to suddenly become the focal point of the passing game, but his efficiency, touchdown involvement and favorable matchup make him a strong streaming option with top-12 upside.
Greg Dulcich MIA
Greg Dulcich hasn’t established himself as a dependable fantasy starter, but his limited receiving production doesn’t completely eliminate him from consideration entering Week 5. Through three appearances, Dulcich has caught nine passes for 90 yards, averaging three receptions and 30 receiving yards per game. He hasn’t found the end zone, and Miami’s inconsistent passing offense has made it difficult for him to establish a reliable fantasy role. The lack of substantial target volume is particularly concerning because Dulcich hasn’t demonstrated that he can produce efficiently enough to overcome limited opportunities. Under ordinary circumstances, I’d be hesitant to recommend him, but his upcoming matchup creates an opportunity for a better performance.
Cincinnati has been one of the more favorable matchups for tight ends, surrendering approximately 18.0 PPR fantasy points per game to the position. The Bengals allowed 299 receiving yards on 23 receptions to tight ends during their first three games before Brenton Strange added seven catches for 95 yards in Week 4. That consistent vulnerability creates an opportunity for Dulcich to become more involved, particularly if Miami looks to attack the middle of the field. The Dolphins haven’t demonstrated that they’ll consistently prioritize him in the passing game, so there’s considerable risk attached to this recommendation. However, the defensive matchup is favorable enough that I’m willing to consider Dulcich in deeper leagues or when streaming the position. He’s a risky TE2 with a realistic path toward outperforming his season averages.
Hunter Henry NE
Hunter Henry has remained a useful receiving option in New England’s offense, although his production through the opening month hasn’t consistently translated into strong fantasy performances. His most encouraging outing came against Buffalo in Week 4, when he caught all five of his targets for 62 yards. That performance demonstrated Henry’s ability to generate meaningful receiving production when Drake Maye looks in his direction, particularly in the intermediate passing game. The Patriots haven’t consistently given him enough opportunities to deliver that level of production every week, making his fantasy outlook difficult to project. However, Henry has maintained a role in New England’s offense, and his recent performance provides some encouragement entering a favorable Week 5 matchup.
Las Vegas has struggled considerably defending tight ends, allowing 20 receptions for 152 yards and five touchdowns through its first three games. The Raiders have surrendered 21.4 PPR fantasy points per game to the position during that stretch, with their inability to prevent receiving touchdowns creating particularly appealing scoring opportunities. That’s an encouraging matchup for Henry because New England doesn’t necessarily need to dramatically increase his target volume for him to deliver a productive fantasy performance. The primary concern is whether the Patriots can consistently sustain drives and create opportunities near the goal line. Still, Henry’s involvement against Buffalo provides a reason for optimism, and Las Vegas’ defensive struggles give him a realistic opportunity to build on that performance. I’m comfortable treating him as a streaming TE1 in Week 5.
Tight Ends to Sit
Dalton Kincaid BUF
Dalton Kincaid opened the season looking like one of fantasy football’s most promising tight ends, but his recent usage has created legitimate concerns entering Week 5. Kincaid caught five passes for 130 yards in Week 1 before adding seven receptions for 95 yards and a touchdown against Detroit. However, his opportunities have declined considerably since then. After receiving eight targets in Week 2, Kincaid saw just three against the Chargers and two against New England, producing only three receptions for 45 yards over those two games. Through four weeks, he’s accumulated 15 receptions for 270 yards and one touchdown, but the majority of that production came during his first two appearances. The early-season upside is encouraging, although his declining involvement makes it difficult to project a dependable workload moving forward.
The Rams have been one of the most difficult defenses for opposing tight ends, allowing only 85 receiving yards to the position through four games. That’s an average of just 21.3 yards per contest, making this a particularly unfavorable matchup for a player whose opportunities have recently become inconsistent. Josh Allen has multiple receiving options available, and Buffalo hasn’t demonstrated the same willingness to feature Kincaid that made him so productive early in the season. His ability to generate explosive receiving performances means he could certainly outperform this recommendation, but I’m hesitant to rely on that happening against a defense that has consistently limited tight end production. Until Kincaid begins commanding a more dependable share of Buffalo’s targets, I’d prefer another option in Week 5.
Brenton Strange JAX
Brenton Strange demonstrated his upside against Cincinnati in Week 4, catching seven of eight targets for 95 yards in his most productive performance of the season. That outing brought his four-game totals to 14 receptions for 167 yards and one touchdown, averaging 3.5 catches and 41.8 receiving yards per contest. His recent increase in opportunities is encouraging, with Strange receiving three targets in Week 1, two in Week 2, five in Week 3 and eight against the Bengals. However, Jacksonville hasn’t consistently featured him enough to establish a dependable fantasy floor, and much of his production has come in favorable matchups. The increased involvement is worth monitoring, but I’m hesitant to assume his Week 4 workload will automatically continue against a more difficult opponent.
Philadelphia presents a considerably tougher matchup than Cincinnati, having allowed just 89 receiving yards to tight ends through its first three games and no touchdowns to the position through four weeks. That’s a significant difference from a Bengals defense surrendering approximately 18.0 PPR fantasy points per game to opposing tight ends. Jacksonville also has several receiving options competing for opportunities, making it difficult to assume Strange will continue commanding eight targets every week. His recent involvement suggests he could be developing into a more important part of the Jaguars’ passing offense, but the Eagles have been effective enough against the position that I’m not willing to chase one breakout performance. I like Strange’s long-term potential, although I’m treating him as a matchup-dependent TE2 rather than a dependable Week 5 starter.
Mark Andrews BAL
Mark Andrews has remained an important part of Baltimore’s passing offense, but his fantasy production hasn’t fully reflected that involvement through four games. Andrews has caught 18 passes for 149 yards and one touchdown, averaging 4.5 receptions and 37.3 receiving yards per contest. His Week 4 performance against Tennessee included five receptions for 27 yards and a touchdown, continuing a trend of limited yardage despite consistent opportunities. However, his underlying receiving metrics are considerably more encouraging. Andrews has commanded a 22.9% target share and 26% first-read share while averaging 1.80 yards per route run, demonstrating that Baltimore still considers him a significant part of its passing attack. The opportunities are there, but the Ravens haven’t consistently generated enough passing production for those numbers to translate into dependable fantasy performances.
Atlanta isn’t an especially difficult matchup, allowing approximately 15.9 PPR fantasy points per game to opposing tight ends through four weeks. The Falcons have also surrendered multiple receiving touchdowns to the position, providing an opportunity for Andrews to capitalize near the goal line. However, my biggest concern is Baltimore’s quarterback situation. Lamar Jackson is dealing with an ankle injury, and Tyler Huntley could start if Jackson is unavailable, creating uncertainty surrounding the Ravens’ passing volume and offensive efficiency. Andrews’ target share suggests he could remain involved regardless of who’s under center, but a potential quarterback change introduces additional risk for an offense that has already struggled to generate consistent receiving production. If Jackson is healthy enough to start without significant limitations, I’d be more comfortable trusting Andrews. Otherwise, I’d prefer another tight end with a more predictable offensive environment in Week 5.
Defenses to Start
Cincinnati Bengals DEF
Cincinnati has become an appealing defensive streaming option because of its ability to generate pressure. The Bengals have recorded 14 sacks through four games, while their 8.59% sack rate ranks fourth in the NFL. That production gives Cincinnati a path toward fantasy points even without relying on defensive touchdowns or multiple interceptions. The Bengals haven’t been dominant in every defensive category, but their ability to disrupt opposing passing games is particularly valuable when evaluating streaming defenses.
Miami is one of the best offenses to target with fantasy defenses, allowing 9.3 fantasy points per game to opposing D/ST units, the sixth-most in the NFL. The Dolphins also rank 30th in offensive EPA per play (-0.144), 29th in dropback EPA (-0.099) and 31st in offensive success rate (34.8%). They’ve failed to score more than 13 points in any of their first four games, creating an opportunity for Cincinnati to capitalize on an offense struggling to sustain drives. Miami’s combination of poor passing efficiency and limited scoring makes this an especially appealing matchup for a defense capable of generating pressure. I’m comfortable starting the Bengals as one of my preferred streaming options for Week 5.
Denver Broncos DEF
Denver is a defense I’m willing to trust in favorable matchups because of its ability to pressure opposing quarterbacks and disrupt drives. The Broncos have generated double-digit sacks through four games, giving them a foundation for fantasy production beyond simply limiting points allowed. Their defensive front is capable of creating difficult passing situations, which becomes especially important against opponents struggling to consistently move the football. I don’t need Denver to generate multiple turnovers to consider it a worthwhile start, but I do want a matchup where its pass rush has a realistic opportunity to make an impact.
The Chargers have been one of the best matchups for fantasy defenses, allowing 9.8 D/ST fantasy points per game, the third-most in the NFL. Los Angeles also ranks 31st in offensive EPA per play (-0.146) and 30th in dropback EPA (-0.115), demonstrating how consistently its passing offense has struggled. That’s an encouraging combination because opposing defenses have already produced strong fantasy performances against the Chargers, rather than simply benefiting from favorable underlying efficiency numbers. Denver’s ability to create pressure gives it a realistic opportunity to capitalize on those struggles, particularly if Los Angeles continues finding itself in obvious passing situations. With the Chargers ranking in the bottom two in offensive EPA and allowing nearly 10 fantasy points per game to opposing defenses, Denver is a strong Week 5 start.
Cleveland Browns DEF
Cleveland is a more aggressive streaming recommendation, but its recent pass-rushing production gives me a reason to consider the Browns in Week 5. The defensive front is coming off a five-sack performance against Pittsburgh, demonstrating its ability to disrupt an opposing passing game and create fantasy-relevant negative plays. That performance is particularly encouraging because sacks can provide a useful foundation for defensive fantasy production even when turnovers are difficult to predict. Cleveland isn’t a defense I’m automatically starting every week, but the pass rush gives it an opportunity to outperform expectations in the right matchup.
The Jets are a more complicated opponent than Miami or Los Angeles, allowing only 4.8 fantasy points per game to opposing defenses, ranking 21st in the NFL. New York also ranks 13th in offensive EPA per play (+0.018), with a respectable +0.160 dropback EPA. However, the rushing attack has been considerably less effective at -0.204 EPA per rush, and the Jets managed only 12 points against Chicago in Week 4. If Cleveland can limit the run and create longer passing situations, its defensive front could generate additional sack opportunities. I’m not treating the Jets as an easy matchup because their passing efficiency and fantasy points allowed suggest otherwise. Nevertheless, Cleveland’s recent five-sack performance makes the Browns a worthwhile lower-end streaming option.
Defenses to Sit
Buffalo Bills DEF
Buffalo hasn’t delivered the type of fantasy production managers expected through the opening month. The Bills are averaging just 3.3 defensive fantasy points per game and have allowed 29 points in three of their first four contests. That’s concerning because even when Buffalo has generated defensive stops, it hasn’t consistently translated into the sacks, turnovers and scoring prevention needed for strong fantasy performances. I’m not suggesting the Bills lack defensive talent, but their actual fantasy production hasn’t justified treating them as an automatic start.
Los Angeles has allowed 7.8 fantasy points per game to opposing defenses, the seventh-most in the NFL, so this isn’t a matchup I’d automatically avoid based on opponent fantasy points allowed. However, the Rams rank 15th in offensive EPA per play (+0.006), suggesting they’ve been closer to league average in overall efficiency than that fantasy matchup ranking might imply. Matthew Stafford also has enough receiving talent around him to generate explosive passing plays, creating additional risk for a Buffalo defense that hasn’t consistently limited scoring. There is certainly a path toward sacks and turnovers, but the Bills haven’t demonstrated enough fantasy production for me to confidently chase that upside. I’d rather stream a defense with a more favorable combination of recent performance and opponent vulnerability.
Seattle Seahawks DEF
Seattle has been one of the better fantasy defenses through four weeks, recording 11 sacks and six interceptions. That’s an encouraging combination of pressure and turnover production, and it’s why I wouldn’t consider dropping the Seahawks simply because of a difficult matchup. They’ve demonstrated that they can generate fantasy points in multiple ways, but even productive defenses can become risky starts when the opposing offense consistently protects the football and avoids negative plays.
San Francisco has been the worst matchup in football for fantasy defenses, allowing an average of -0.5 D/ST fantasy points per game, ranking 32nd in the NFL. The 49ers also lead the league in offensive EPA per play (+0.274), offensive success rate (54.1%) and dropback EPA (+0.539). Most importantly, San Francisco hasn’t allowed a sack through four games and has committed only two turnovers, leaving opposing defenses with very few opportunities to generate fantasy points. That’s particularly concerning for Seattle because sacks and takeaways have been major contributors to its early-season success. The Seahawks have enough talent to create a big play against anyone, but I’m not willing to ignore how effectively San Francisco has protected the football. I’m holding Seattle rather than dropping it, but I’m not starting the Seahawks against the league’s most efficient offense.
Philadelphia Eagles DEF
Philadelphia has been one of the more disappointing fantasy defenses through the opening month, averaging only 2.5 defensive fantasy points per game. The Eagles haven’t scored more than five fantasy points in any of their first four contests, demonstrating that their defensive talent hasn’t translated into consistent fantasy production. That’s an important distinction because a defense can play reasonably well in real life without generating enough sacks, turnovers or defensive scores to help fantasy managers. Until Philadelphia begins creating more of those opportunities, I’m not comfortable treating it as a weekly starter.
Jacksonville has allowed only 2.8 fantasy points per game to opposing defenses, the sixth-fewest in the NFL. The Jaguars also rank seventh in offensive EPA per play (+0.142), seventh in dropback EPA (+0.222) and eighth in offensive success rate (48.5%). They’ve also generated positive rushing EPA (+0.049), giving them a balanced offensive profile that can make it difficult for opposing defenses to create obvious passing situations. Philadelphia could certainly play a competitive game defensively, but Jacksonville’s efficiency and the Eagles’ limited fantasy production create a difficult combination. With no performance above five fantasy points through four weeks, I’d rather use a defense facing an offense that provides clearer opportunities for sacks and turnovers.
Kickers to Start
Dominic Zvada NYG
Dominic Zvada has been one of the most productive kickers through four weeks, converting all nine of his field-goal attempts. Three of those makes have come from beyond 50 yards, demonstrating the range that can create substantial fantasy upside. The Giants haven’t been an especially efficient offense, ranking 23rd in EPA per play (-0.047), but they’ve still provided Zvada with consistent scoring opportunities. His perfect accuracy and ability to convert long-distance attempts make him an appealing option even when New York isn’t consistently finishing drives with touchdowns.
Washington has allowed 11.8 fantasy points per game to opposing kickers, the third-most in the NFL. That’s one of the strongest matchup numbers available at the position and gives me more confidence in Zvada’s opportunity to remain productive. The Commanders have allowed opposing kickers to generate double-digit fantasy production on average, which is encouraging for a Giants offense that hasn’t consistently finished drives with touchdowns. New York doesn’t need to dominate offensively for Zvada to benefit, particularly if it can generate multiple possessions that reach scoring range. With Washington ranking among the three most favorable kicker matchups, I’m comfortable keeping Zvada in my Week 5 lineup.
Chris Boswell PIT
Chris Boswell hasn’t been as accurate as fantasy managers are accustomed to seeing, converting seven of 10 field-goal attempts through four weeks. However, the volume remains encouraging, with Pittsburgh giving him an average of 2.5 attempts per game. Boswell has also connected from 56 yards, demonstrating that his range remains an asset despite the early misses. Three missed attempts are concerning, but I’m more interested in the fact that Pittsburgh continues giving him opportunities. The Steelers rank 25th in offensive EPA per play (-0.073), yet they’ve still generated enough scoring chances to keep Boswell involved.
Indianapolis has allowed 10.8 fantasy points per game to opposing kickers, the sixth-most in the NFL, making this one of the more favorable matchups for the position. Pittsburgh has already demonstrated that it can generate field-goal opportunities even when the offense isn’t particularly efficient, and the Colts’ defensive results suggest Boswell could receive additional chances. Aaron Rodgers doesn’t need to produce a dominant passing performance for Boswell to benefit, particularly if the Steelers can move into scoring range without converting every possession into a touchdown. His 70% field-goal conversion rate introduces more risk than usual, but the opportunity and matchup remain encouraging. I’m willing to start Boswell against a Colts defense that has allowed opposing kickers to produce double-digit fantasy points per game.
Spencer Shrader IND
Spencer Shrader has been one of the most reliable fantasy kickers through four weeks, converting all 11 of his field-goal attempts. He’s also made four kicks from beyond 50 yards, giving him significant upside in formats that reward long-distance field goals. Indianapolis has provided him with consistent opportunities despite ranking only 24th in offensive EPA per play (-0.048). That’s an encouraging combination because Shrader hasn’t needed an especially efficient offense to generate fantasy production. His accuracy, volume and range have made him one of the strongest kicker options through the opening month.
Pittsburgh has allowed 10.5 fantasy points per game to opposing kickers, the ninth-most in the NFL. The Steelers have enough defensive talent to create problems for Indianapolis near the red zone, potentially forcing the Colts to settle for field goals rather than touchdowns. Shrader’s ability to convert from beyond 50 yards also gives him opportunities even when Indianapolis struggles to reach the red zone. With Pittsburgh allowing double-digit fantasy points per game to opposing kickers and Shrader already receiving substantial volume, this is a matchup I’m willing to target. His groin issue is worth monitoring before kickoff, although he previously played through the concern and remained productive. Assuming he’s healthy and active, I’m comfortable keeping Shrader in my Week 5 lineup.
Kickers to Sit
Jake Elliott PHI
Jake Elliott has been accurate through four weeks, converting all four of his field-goal attempts, but Philadelphia hasn’t given him enough opportunities to produce consistent fantasy numbers. Averaging only one field-goal attempt per game creates a difficult fantasy environment regardless of how reliable the kicker is. The Eagles also rank 29th in offensive EPA per play (-0.110), with a 36.7% success rate, demonstrating how frequently the offense has struggled to sustain drives. Elliott’s accuracy isn’t the issue; it’s the lack of consistent scoring opportunities.
Jacksonville has allowed only 6.3 fantasy points per game to opposing kickers, the sixth-fewest in the NFL. That’s a difficult matchup for Elliott because Philadelphia has already struggled to generate consistent field-goal opportunities. The Eagles could have difficulty sustaining drives against Jacksonville, limiting the number of possessions that reach scoring range. Even if Philadelphia moves the football more effectively than it did against Los Angeles, that doesn’t guarantee multiple kicking opportunities. With just four attempts through four games and an opponent that has consistently limited kicker production, I’m looking elsewhere at the position.
Trey Smack GB
Trey Smack has demonstrated impressive range through four weeks, converting six of seven field-goal attempts, including a 59-yarder. However, Green Bay hasn’t consistently provided him with enough opportunities to become a dependable fantasy starter. The Packers rank 26th in offensive EPA per play (-0.074), while their 38.8% offensive success rate ranks 31st. That’s concerning because an offense that struggles to sustain drives can leave its kicker without opportunities, regardless of how accurate he is from long distance. Smack has the ability to produce a strong performance, but the weekly volume remains difficult to predict.
Chicago has allowed just 6.3 fantasy points per game to opposing kickers, ranking 26th in the NFL. That’s an unfavorable matchup for Smack, particularly because Green Bay will need to generate more consistent offensive production than it has shown through the opening month. The Bears have been one of the league’s more efficient offenses, ranking eighth in offensive EPA per play (+0.116), which could create additional game-script concerns if Green Bay falls behind. However, Chicago’s offensive efficiency alone doesn’t establish how many field goals the Packers will attempt. The bigger issue is Green Bay’s own inability to consistently sustain drives. Smack’s range gives him upside, but I’d rather use a kicker attached to an offense generating more dependable opportunities.
Andy Borregales NE
Andy Borregales has converted five of seven field-goal attempts through four weeks, giving him a 71.4% success rate. While he’s demonstrated the ability to make kicks from 50 yards, New England hasn’t consistently generated enough opportunities to make him a dependable fantasy starter. Borregales didn’t attempt a field goal against Buffalo in Week 4 despite the Patriots scoring 29 points, illustrating how offensive scoring doesn’t necessarily translate into kicking production. New England ranks 22nd in offensive EPA per play (-0.043), and Borregales has averaged fewer than two field-goal attempts per game.
Las Vegas has been one of the most difficult matchups for fantasy kickers, allowing just 4.8 fantasy points per game to the position, the second-fewest in the NFL. That’s particularly concerning for Borregales because New England hasn’t established a consistent field-goal kicking environment. Even if the Patriots move the football effectively against the Raiders, that doesn’t guarantee multiple attempts, especially if their scoring opportunities result in touchdowns rather than field goals. Borregales’ 71.4% conversion rate adds another concern, and the Raiders’ defensive results provide little reason to overlook his limited volume. I’d rather start a kicker with a more established combination of accuracy and opportunity.
